Implementation of Uterine Fibroid Option Grid Patient Decision Aids Across Five Organizational Settings: a Randomized Stepped-wedge Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 748
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- The number of eligible patients that can be identified who receive the uterine fibroid Option Grid patient decision aid.
研究概览
简要总结
UPFRONT is a study that aims to use two implementation frameworks - the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Normalization Process Theory - to guide the implementation of a uterine fibroid patient decision aid, known as Option Grid, at five diverse gynecology settings across the United States. Option Grid provides evidence-based information on the various treatment options to help women across socioeconomic strata with symptomatic uterine fibroids make a preference-sensitive decision.
详细描述
Background & significance
Uterine fibroids are non-cancerous overgrowths of smooth muscle in the uterus. As they grow, a proportion of fibroids give rise to problems, such as heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pain, discomfort during sexual intercourse, and/or difficulty becoming pregnant. Some fibroids cause miscarriage, preterm birth, and increase the risk of cesarean birth. Multiple treatments are available: medication, removal of the inner layer of the uterus wall (endometrial ablation), removal of the uterus (hysterectomy) or part of the fibroid (myomectomy), or blocking some of the blood supply to the uterus (uterine artery embolization). Given the different consequences of treatment options, such as time away from work and impact on fertility, choosing the best option is sensitive to individual preferences. This study seeks to improve healthcare delivery and treatment choices for women of different socioeconomic status (SES) and health literacy levels experiencing symptoms from uterine fibroids.
Approximately 50% of women of reproductive age have fibroids, and at least 50% of these women have significant symptoms. These women report substantial impairment in quality of life and increased costs associated with the impact on daily living. While existing evidence is inconclusive about disparities in treatment choice, the associated socioeconomic burden is even greater in African-American women and those of lower SES. Despite a greater incidence and severity of symptomatic fibroids among African-American women, Hispanic women, and women of lower SES, one study shows that these women are less likely to undergo laparoscopic intervention, while another study found no significant differences between procedure rates between African-American and white women. Nevertheless, African-American women are more likely to experience poor treatment outcomes than white women.
A systematic review (2002) indicated that insufficient evidence exists about the comparative effectiveness of treatments for uterine fibroids. Viswanathan confirmed this view in 2007, saying that "the dearth of high-quality evidence is remarkable given how commonly this problem occurs." A report by Velentgas et al demonstrated similar outcomes between the uterine-sparing treatment options (endometrial ablation, uterine artery embolization, and myomectomy) on the onset of new or recurrent symptoms post-treatment. Myomectomy and uterine artery embolization led to a reduced risk of having a subsequent procedure compared to endometrial ablation. The lack of comparative evidence demonstrating superiority of any one treatment reinforces the role of shared decision making (SDM) in this context.
SDM is considered the pinnacle of patient-centered, ethical care and aims to promote two-way communication between clinicians and patients. Patient decision aids are interventions that provide evidence-based information to patients so they can make decisions that align with their preferences, thus facilitating the SDM process. For example, Option Grid encounter patient decision aids (ePDAs) are available in various formats (paper, picture, online interactive) and present information in a tabular format so patients can compare options. The use of Option Grids, and other similar ePDAs in other settings, also provide evidence that these tools are effective. A stepped-wedge study showed higher levels of SDM when Option Grid decision aids were used with patients who had knee osteoarthritis, as well as an increase in patient knowledge, without lengthening the encounter's duration. Similar results were found when Option Grid ePDAs were used by pediatricians with parents facing decisions about circumcision. In addition, five randomized trials using ePDAs at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, have demonstrated their impact on SDM, whereas there is less evidence that PDAs used solely by patients before clinical encounters lead to observed changes in SDM.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- None
盲法说明
Data analysts will be blinded to the setting randomization.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients showing new or recurrent symptoms of uterine fibroids (e.g. heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pressure or pain, etc.) who are seeking treatment.
- •Assigned female sex at birth
- •At least 18 years of age
- •Speak English or Spanish
- •Have the ability to complete short surveys online independently or assisted by a caregiver.
- •The investigators will also include health care professionals who will provide care to women with symptomatic uterine fibroids during the project duration at participating sites.
排除标准
- •Patients who are under 18
- •Patients not assigned female sex at birth
- •Women who are postmenopausal because they will have different treatment options than the ones presented in this study's intervention.
结局指标
主要结局
The number of eligible patients that can be identified who receive the uterine fibroid Option Grid patient decision aid.
时间窗: Month 1-14
次要结局
- Attitudes toward Decision Aids fOr PatienTs (ADOPT)(Month 1, Month 9, Month 22)
- Measuring Organizational Readiness for patient Engagement (MORE)(Before week 1)
- Measuring shared decision making(Through Month 1-6, Month 8-14)
- Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (UFS-QOL) symptom severity subscale(Through Month 1-6, Month 8-14)
- The Comprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST)(Through Month 1-6, Month 8-14)
- NoMAD Normalization Process Theory (NPT) survey(Month 6 and Month 22)
- Quality of shared decision making(Through Month 1-6, Month 8-14)
- Fidelity assessment(Through Month 10-14)
- Chew Health Literacy Measure(Through Month 1-6, Month 8-14)
- Utility of Option Grid patient decision aids and clinician approach to implementation(Month 14 and Month 22)
- Resource utilization (ambulatory and hospital)(Through Month 1-6, Month 8-14)
- Patient demographics(Through Month 1-6, Month 8-14)
- Treatment choice(Through Month 1-6, Month 8-14)
研究者
Glyn Jones-Elwyn
Principal Investigator
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
