跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05065333
NCT05065333已完成不适用

Implement and PREDICT Shock: An Implementation Trial of Predictive Modeling to Enhance Diagnosis and Improve Critical Treatment in Pediatric Septic Shock

University of Colorado, Denver1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,345 人开始时间: 2022年3月16日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
1,345
试验地点
1
主要终点
Number of Patients Receiving Guideline-Concordant Septic Shock Care

研究概览

简要总结

This study is a prospective, stepped-wedge implementation trial to test the effects of implementing a Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool for prediction of septic shock in four Emergency Departments within a pediatric healthcare network. The primary outcome will be the proportion of sepsis patients who receive guideline-concordant septic shock care after implementation of the CDS, and the secondary outcome will be time-to-antibiotic after sepsis recognition.

详细描述

Septic shock is a leading global cause of pediatric death. In the US, the in-hospital mortality rate for children with sepsis is 5-20%. Septic shock is a state of critical infection that requires advanced and resource-intensive resuscitation, and morbidity-free survival depends on timely diagnosis. Critical care delivered in a delayed fashion, after a child is in hypotensive shock, is less effective; for each hour of unrecognized shock the odds of death more than double. Advances have been made in timely sepsis treatment, but improving diagnosis of septic shock in children remains elusive. Improved early diagnosis would accelerate treatment and improve outcomes.

Tools that have been deployed to improve diagnosis in pediatric sepsis either diagnose it after organ dysfunction criteria have been met, or depend heavily on subspecialty physician judgment and have not been tested outside of tertiary pediatric hospitals. Thus, the evidence-based 2020 Surviving Sepsis Children's Guidelines for pediatric sepsis stated that "high-quality trials on pediatric sepsis recognition are lacking, and data are not sufficient to suggest any particular screening tool," and identified pediatric sepsis recognition trials as an important research need. Despite this, the guidelines weakly recommended screening patients "who present as acutely unwell" for septic shock, citing very low quality evidence. The guidelines also stated that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of any existing pediatric sepsis screening tools.

This study addresses the gap in knowledge about the effectiveness of pediatric sepsis prediction tools. The study team has developed and retrospectively validated early diagnostic models that leverage clinical data in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) to predict septic shock in children the emergency setting [1, 2]. In order to address concerns about alert fatigue and antibiotic overuse, these predictive models were designed to identify patients at high risk for shock among patients in whom clinicians initially had some suspicion for sepsis.

In this pilot implementation trial, Clinical Decision Support based on septic shock prediction models will be introduced to 4 pediatric Emergency Departments (EDs) within the Children's Hospital Colorado care system in a stepped wedge design, in addition to routine clinical care. Routine clinical care at all study sites includes existing sepsis pathways, order sets, and quality metrics that are aligned with the national Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes Collaborative and the Pediatric Surviving Sepsis guidelines. The primary outcome will be the proportion of sepsis patients who receive guideline-concordant septic shock care after implementation of the CDS, and the secondary outcome will be time-to-antibiotic after sepsis recognition.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Single (Participant)

盲法说明

Emergency Department sites (unit of randomization) cannot be blinded; however patients who are subjects of the intervention are not aware of the arm of the site in the clinical trial.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Emergency Department Inclusion Criteria:
  • •Children's Hospital Colorado Emergency Care sites
  • •All providers (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants) at Children's Hospital Colorado Emergency Care sites will be included

排除标准

  • •Patients whose secondary data will be used to assess the outcomes of the intervention will be 60 days through 18 years old.

研究组 & 干预措施

Septic Shock Clinical Decision Support

Experimental

Emergency Department sites in this arm will have Clinical Decision Support (CDS) alerts active in the Electronic Health Record during clinical ED care of patients with suspected sepsis, in addition to following usual institutional standard of care for sepsis. The CDS will alert providers to patients at high risk for developing septic shock.

干预措施: Septic Shock Clinical Decision Support (Other)

Clinical Diagnosis Only

Active Comparator

Emergency Department sites in this arm will follow the institutional standard for sepsis care without Clinical Decision Support. Standard care includes clinical diagnosis of sepsis supported by institutional sepsis education, a sepsis pathway and orderset.

干预措施: Clinical Diagnosis Only (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Number of Patients Receiving Guideline-Concordant Septic Shock Care

时间窗: Up to 24 hours after Emergency Department arrival

Treatment will be defined as concordant with Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for shock if intravenous antibiotics are initiated within 60 minutes of sepsis recognition and an intravenous fluid bolus is initiated within 60 minutes of sepsis recognition. This will be a binary outcome. Sepsis recognition is defined as the earlier of: sepsis page sent, sepsis orderset use, or intravenous antibiotic order.

次要结局

  • Time to Antibiotics(Up to 24 hours after Emergency Department arrival)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Implementation Trial of Predictive Modeling to... | 临床试验