跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03158350
NCT03158350已完成不适用

A Tooth Brushing Technique That Reduces Gingival Inflammation and Toothbrush Deformation

Tufts University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 48 人开始时间: 2015年8月3日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
48
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change in Gingival Inflammation

研究概览

简要总结

Toothbrush plaque removal, along with interproximal flossing, helps to maintain the oral cavity free from periodontal diseases and dental caries. Although techniques such as the Bass Technique (BT), the Modified Bass Technique (MBT) and the Modified Stillman Technique (MST) are taught to dental students, dental hygiene students, and dental assistants, there is little evidence to discern which technique is more effective in reducing or preventing gingival inflammation.

At Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM), a modification of the Bass intrasulcular technique is advocated to many students. We call this modification of the Bass technique a Stationary Bristle Technique (SBT), which is an intrasulcular technique that maintains the toothbrush bristle ends essentially stationary on the tooth cervically and in the gingival crevice.

In this study, half of the participants were taught the Stationary Bristle Technique Group, while the other half were not be provided with instructions, but asked to brush as normal (non-interventional group) throughout the duration of the study.

详细描述

This is a double-armed, randomized clinical trial. The primary aim of this study is to compare whether a Stationary Brushing Technique (SBT) is more effective in the reduction of gingival inflammation than permitting people to brush the way they normally do without instruction (Non-Stationary Brushing Technique).

Gingival inflammation is evidenced by the percentage (%) sites with Bleeding on Probing (BoP). The primary time-point will be at 4 weeks.

The amount of toothbrush bristle deformation at 4 weeks, 12, and 16 weeks of brushing with a SBT and with a NSBT will also be evaluated. 3. The secondary evaluation of BoP will be at the 12 and 16 week time-point.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Subjects must be at least 18 years of age
  • Subjects must have at least 20 teeth
  • Subjects must have had a professional dental prophylaxis done in the 3 months prior to the beginning of the study
  • Subjects exhibiting 10% or greater BoP at the baseline examination

排除标准

  • Subjects wearing fixed orthodontic appliances (including lingual retainers or Invisalign®)
  • Subjects who smoke (=more than 0 cigarettes a day)
  • Subjects who received antibiotic treatment during the month prior to the beginning of the study
  • Subjects who have cervical probing depth (PD) greater than 3mm
  • Subjects diagnosed with periodontal disease at any site as defined bleeding on probing with cervical probing depths greater than 3 mm and loss of cervical attachment.
  • Subjects who are currently pregnant (self-report).

研究组 & 干预措施

Stationary Bristle Technique (SBT)

Experimental

Instructed brushing method. Participants are asked to brush twice daily, for 2 minutes at a time, following instructions for the Stationary Bristle Technique.

干预措施: Instructed Brushing Method (Other)

Non-Stationary Bristle Technique (NSBT)

No Intervention

The control group will be asked to brush twice daily, for 2 minutes at a time, following their normal toothbrushing technique.

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Gingival Inflammation

时间窗: From Baseline up to 4 weeks

Measured by the percentage of sites with BoP. The percentage of sites with BoP at each time point will be calculated by group

次要结局

  • Change in BoP(From baseline up to 16 weeks)
  • Toothbrush Bristle Deformation(From baseling up to 16 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验