Comparison of a Short Compression Hosiery (Stocking Without a Foot) With Standard Compression Stockings After Radiofrequency Ablation of Great Saphenous Vein With Phlebectomy: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 187
- 试验地点
- 6
- 主要终点
- Quality of life score measured by CIVIQ20 questionnaire
研究概览
简要总结
A prospective comparative randomized multicentre non-inferiority trial. The purpose of this study is to compares of a short compression hosiery (stocking without a foot, compression class 2) with standard compression class 2 stockings for 7 days after the endovascular radiofrequency ablation of great saphenous vein with phlebectomy varicose tributaries.
详细描述
It is common practice to use compression hosiery in the postoperative period to reduce pain, swelling, ecchymosis and hematoms. Long-term compression therapy is associated with a number of inconveniences, which leads to a decrease in compliance and violation of the patient's appointed treatment schedule. The use of short compression stoking can improve the compliance to applying of compression in a round-the-clock mode while maintaining the effectiveness of therapy.
The aim of the study The purpose of this study is to compare a short compression hosiery (stocking without a foot, compression class 2) with standard compression class 2 stockings for 7 days after the endovascular radiofrequency ablation of great saphenous vein with phlebectomy varicose tributaries.
Materials and methods A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial. The study compares the effectiveness of a short compression hosiery (stocking without a foot, compression class 2) with standard compression class 2 stockings for 7 days after the endovascular radiofrequency ablation of great saphenous vein with phlebectomy varicose tributaries.
The study includes patients who are scheduled for the radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein and phlebectomy varicose tributaries (CEAP classification classes C2-C4).
Endpoints in the study: the main outcome (primary endpoint) is the quality of life according to CIVIQ questionnaire on the 30th day after the intervention. Additional outcomes (secondary endpoints): comfort of using short compression stocking with the visual analog scale (VAS), pain level with the visual analogue scale (VAS), foot swelling. Registration of results for additional outcomes is conducted on days 1, 7, 14 and 30.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 80 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Adults over 18 years of age
- •Symptomatic great saphenous vein (GSV) vein reflux > 0.5 seconds on color Duplex
- •CEAP C2-C4 (inclusive)
- •Informed consent
排除标准
- •Symptomatic small saphenous vein (SSV) vein reflux
- •CEAP Class C5 or C6 disease
- •Prior GSV treatment
- •History of deep vein thrombosis
- •Acute deep or superficial vein thrombosis
- •Pregnancy
- •Patients who are unable to attend the hospital for follow-up
结局指标
主要结局
Quality of life score measured by CIVIQ20 questionnaire
时间窗: 30 days
The specific quality of life score using the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ) score Calculation of the Global Index Score (GIS) of CIVIQ-20 There are 20 questions in the CIVIQ-20, each with 5 possible answers (1 to 5), the minimum possible score being 20 and the maximum 100. In order to calculate the GIS, the difference between the final score and the minimum possible score is to be divided by the difference between the theoretical maximum and minimum scores (100-20=80), multiplied by 100.
次要结局
- Comfort of using compression hosiery(1, 7, 14, 21, 30 days)
- Pain level(1, 7, 14, 21, 30 days)
研究者
Igor Zolotukhin
Clinical Professor
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University