Éxito a Corto Plazo de Los Implantes Ultra-estrechos (2,75 mm) en comparación Con Implantes de Plataforma Regular (4,3 mm) Que Requieren regeneración ósea Vestibular simultánea. Ensayo clínico Aleatorizado
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 40
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Success
研究概览
简要总结
The main target of the study is to compare ultra-narrow diameter implants (2.75 mm) without bone regeneration versus standard diameter implants (4.3 mm) in combination with bone regeneration. To do so, patients with missing upper central incisors, canines, first or second premolars with alveolar ridges of 6 - 8 mm of thickness will be restored with dental implants. Cone beam computed tomographic examination and clinical values will be registered before and after the surgical procedure at 6 and 12 months.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •One missing teeth in position: upper central incisor, canine or premolar
- •alveolar ridge thickness of 6 - 8 mm
- •alveolar ridge height of ≥ 10 mm
排除标准
- •Missing data
- •ASA ≥ III
研究组 & 干预措施
Ultra-narrow Implant
干预措施: Ultra-narrow implant (Procedure)
Standard Implant
干预措施: Standard implant (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
Success
时间窗: 12 months
According to criteria described by Albrektsson et al. 1986
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Rui Figueiredo
PhD - Assitant Professor
University of Barcelona
