跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04577092
NCT04577092已完成不适用

Do Motor-cognitive and Motor-motor Dual Task Training Effect Differently Balance Performance in Older Adults?

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2017年9月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
50
试验地点
2
主要终点
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

研究概览

简要总结

Dual task training (DTT) have been showed that have satisfying effects on older adults. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of motor-cognitive DTT (mCdtt) and motor-motor DTT (mMdtt) on balance, fear of falling, walking functionality and muscle strength in older adults. The participants were divided into two groups; who received mCdtt (Group 1) and who received mMdtt (Group 2). The intervention program had lasted for 8 weeks.

详细描述

Dual task training (DTT) have been showed that have satisfying effects on older adults. The aim of this study is comparing the effect of motor-cognitive DTT (mCdtt) and motor-motor DTT (mMdtt) on balance, fear of falling, walking functionality and muscle strength in older adults. A total of 50 participants aged 60 and over (mean age: 67.72±7.33 years), having a score ≥ 24 on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), being in category of walking ability ≥ 4 according to the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), having no problem in visual ability and hearing were included for this study. The participants who received mCdtt (Group 1) counted back from the two-digit number and the participants who received mMdtt (Group 2) held half-filled glasses with 90o flexion elbow with both hand while performing exercises. The intervention program had lasted for 8 weeks. To assess balance, fear of falling, walking functionality and muscle strength of participants, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Hand-held dynamometer were used, respectively.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
60 Years 至 90 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • (1) age over 60 years old
  • (2) score ≥ 24 on the Mini-Mental State Exam
  • (3) category of walking ability ≥ 4 according to the Functional Ambulation Category
  • (4) no problem in visual ability and hearing

排除标准

  • (1) a history of specific balance problems (i.e., diagnosed neurological, musculoskeletal or vestibular disorder)
  • (2) history of cerebrovascular occasion
  • (3) history of hip-knee surgery
  • (4) use of medication(s) such as sedatives and hypnotics, antidepressants and benzodiazepines.

结局指标

主要结局

Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

时间窗: End of the training (8 weeks after)

BBS is a widely used, reliable and valid scale, which was developed to measure balance in older adults with functional postures and movements. It consists of 14 items scoring from 0 (unable/unsafe) to 4 (independent/safe). The highest score was 56 and means the best ability of balance. Score of 0-20, 21-40 and 41-56 mean bad, fair and good ability of balance, respectively

次要结局

  • Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I)(End of the training (8 weeks after))
  • Timed Up and Go (TUG)(End of the training (8 weeks after))
  • Muscle Testing (MT)(End of the training (8 weeks after))

研究者

发起方
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Aybike Senel

Research Assistant, Sub-investigator, Physiotherapist, MSc

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验