IRCT20181211041933N1已完成3 期
Comparison of using physics forceps and conventional forceps on post tooth extraction complication
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 28
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 years 至 45 years（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Those who are ASA (American Association of Anesthesiologists) are classified in the I-II Group according to the ASA (*) table.
- •People whose teeth have a thickness of 3 mm or more and have a healthy structure above the gingival margin level
- •People who do not have a local anesthetic prescription
- •People who do not have dental periodontal disease or not have a soft, hard tissue around the teeth
- •Those who do not need to remove the tooth for orthodontic treatment.
- •People who do not have the roots left.
- •Women who are not pregnant or not Postmenopausal
- •Persons with abnormal dental roots (severe or felonous roots, hyperthermosis roots or internal or external analysis, etc.)
- •18-45 years
排除标准
- •Persons who do not have the consent to continue studying for any reason
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
2 期
ASSESSMENT OF THE BENEFICIAL EFFECTS OF PHYSICS FORCEPS OVER THE CONVENTIONAL FORCEPS IN THE EXTRACTION OF TEETHCTRI/2023/05/052833Manipal College of Dental Sciences
尚未招募
4 期
ew tooth extraction instrumentCTRI/2021/10/037689SBV UNIVERSITY
Unknown
不适用
Comparison between forceps , single blade forceps and manual extraction of fetal head in elective ceaserean section :PACTR201710002607341ahmed sherif abdel wahab150
尚未招募
不适用
A novel method of atraumatic extraction for primary teeth using physics forceps.CTRI/2019/08/020911arayana Dental College and Hospital
已完成
不适用
using magnet for nasotracheal intubatioIRCT20100527004041N17Tabriz University of Medical Sciences60