ISRCTN38042170已完成不适用
A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway with the oropharyngeal airway and facemask to achieve manual ventilation in children as performed by critical care and anaesthetic nurses
Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)0 个研究点目标入组 70 人开始时间: 2006年5月2日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 70
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •1. Patients aged between 6 months and 8 years scheduled for anaesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I and II surgery or a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan
- •2. Patients who would routinely have an LMA inserted
排除标准
- •1. Patients with an expected difficult airway
- •2. Patients with oesophageal reflux
- •3. Patients under 6 months
- •4. Patients 9 years or older
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
不适用
Comparative study to see the gastric volume in two airway device groupsCTRI/2022/07/044102AIIMS rishikesh
尚未招募
不适用
Comparision of airway protector in laparoscopic surgeryCTRI/2022/06/043562Department of Anaesthesiology
已完成
4 期
Comparison of two airway securing techniques for prone surgery under anesthesiaCTRI/2018/04/013242Department of anesthesia60
已完成
不适用
A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with the facemask and oropharyngeal airway for manual ventilation by PAediatric Ward nurseS in childreManual ventilationRespiratoryISRCTN38888037Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)105
尚未招募
不适用
To Compare Between Two Supraglottic Airway Devices in Anaesthetised, Paralysed PatientsCTRI/2021/12/038687Maulana Azad Medical College