跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02085447
NCT02085447已完成不适用

A Concierge Model of Customized Adherence Enhancement Plus Long-acting Injectable Antipsychotic (CAL-C) in Individuals With Schizophrenia at Risk for Treatment Non-adherence and for Homelessness

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2014年5月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
30
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change in Tablets Routine Questionnaire (TRQ, Past Week) From Screen to Week 25 Visit

研究概览

简要总结

This is a prospective study using a concierge model of customized adherence enhancement and long-acting injectable antipsychotic (CAL-Concierge) in 30 individuals with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder at risk for treatment non-adherence and for homelessness. Like the CAE-L approach, CAL-Concierge is expected to improve health outcomes among the most vulnerable of populations with schizophrenia but even more importantly, will demonstrate that it can be used to improve the efficiency and quality of care in typical practice settings.

详细描述

Psychotropic medications are a cornerstone of treatment for individuals with schizophrenia, but rates of full or partial non-adherence exceed 60%. There is direct correlation between non-adherence and rates of relapse in schizophrenia; on average, non-adherent patients have a risk of relapse that is 3.7 times greater than their adherent counterparts. Long-acting injectable antipsychotic (LAI) medication can improve adherence but needs to be combined with a quality behavioral program to modify long-term attitudes and behaviors.

A recently completed study funded by the Reuter Foundation and conducted by these investigators found that a novel customized psychosocial adherence enhancement intervention paired with LAI (CAE-L) reduced rates of homelessness, improved psychiatric symptoms and increased overall functioning in this very vulnerable group of individuals. CAE has been manualized and appears very acceptable to homeless people with serious mental illness. However, in spite of the very promising results, the CAE-L intervention has some important limitations that are barriers to its wide-spread future use in public health settings. These limitations are:

  1. CAE-L used a PhD-level psychologist to deliver the behavioral part of the program. Many public-sector clinical settings have a very limited number of such highly trained individuals. As an alternative, social workers could be an efficient way to deliver CAE.
  2. CAE-L used only haloperidol decanoate as the injectable medication. Unfortunately, akathisia-- a very distressing side effect, occurred in 40% of people. Use of a newer, better tolerated medication option could improve the investigators approach.
  3. Logistic barriers preventing people who were stabilized and doing well on CAE-L to continue their improved functioning once they transitioned back to regular care settings. It is clear that there needs to be a mechanism to facilitate the successful "hand-off" of individuals who have benefitted from CAE-L into maintenance therapy. A successful transition could have substantial financial and humanitarian cost-savings.

To address these obstacles and in preparation for a large-scale randomized controlled trial of this novel, blended intervention the investigators propose to conduct a prospective study using a concierge model of customized adherence enhancement combined with a long-acting injectable antipsychotic (CAL-Concierge) in individuals with schizophrenia at risk for treatment non-adherence and for homelessness. Like the CAE-L approach, CAL-Concierge is expected to improve health outcomes among the most vulnerable of populations with schizophrenia but even more importantly, will demonstrate that it can be used to improve the efficiency and quality of care in typical practice settings.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Individuals age 18 and older with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder as confirmed by the Mini International Psychiatric Inventory (MINI). The investigators will use a DSM-5 concordant version of the MINI if it is available at the time that the first study participant is enrolled.
  • Individuals who are currently or have been recently homeless (within the past 12 months) as per revised federal definition of homelessness (Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing. In: Development DoHaU, ed2011.)
  • Known to have medication treatment adherence problems as identified by the Treatment Routines Questionnaire (TRQ, 20% or more missed medications in past week or past month)
  • Ability to be rated on psychiatric rating scales.
  • Willingness to take long-acting injectable medication
  • Currently in treatment at a Community Mental Health Clinic (CMHC) or other treatment setting able to provide mental health care during and after study participation
  • Able to provide written, informed consent to study participation.

排除标准

  • Individuals on long-acting injectable antipsychotic medication immediately prior to study enrollment.
  • Prior or current treatment with clozapine
  • Medical condition or illness, which in the opinion of the research psychiatrist, would interfere with the patient's ability to participate in the trial
  • Physical dependence on substances (alcohol or illicit drugs) likely to lead to withdrawal reaction during the course of the study in the clinical opinion of the treated research psychiatrist
  • Immediate risk of harm to self or others
  • Female who is currently pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Individual who is already in permanent and supported housing that includes comprehensive mental health services (i.e. Housing First)

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Tablets Routine Questionnaire (TRQ, Past Week) From Screen to Week 25 Visit

时间窗: Screen, Week 25

The Tablets Routine Questionnaire (TRQ) determines the proportion of prescribed medication taken and is not dependent upon timing of medication provided that medication is consumed within the required day/24 hour period. This rating has demonstrated statistically significant association with past non-adherence, repeated past non-adherence, any non-adherence in the past month, and non-adherence in the past week. The TRQ format will be modified slightly to document all adherence values (an exact proportion) for each item. TRQ scores ranges from perfect adherence (0% missed) to missing all medication (100% missed). An average TRQ was calculated for individuals on more than one BD medication.

Long-acting Injection (LAI) Adherence

时间窗: Week 25

Long-acting injection (LAI) adherence will be determined as a proportion of LAI (paliperidone palmitate or haloperidol decanoate) injections received at the appropriate time (within 7 days of scheduled time).

Change in Tablets Routine Questionnaire (TRQ) (Past Month) From Screen to Week 25

时间窗: Screen, Week 25

The Tablets Routine Questionnaire (TRQ) determines the proportion of prescribed medication taken and is not dependent upon timing of medication provided that medication is consumed within the required day/24 hour period. This rating has demonstrated statistically significant association with past non-adherence, repeated past non-adherence, any non-adherence in the past month, and non-adherence in the past week. The TRQ format will be modified slightly to document all adherence values (an exact proportion) for each item. TRQ scores ranges from perfect adherence (0% missed) to missing all medication (100% missed). An average TRQ was calculated for individuals on more than one BD medication.

次要结局

  • Change in CGI (Clinical Global Impression) From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) From Baseline to Week 25(Baseline, Week 25)
  • Change in SAS (Simpson Angus Scale) From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in ESRS-A (Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale-Abbreviated; Dyskinesia) From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in ASSIST GRS (Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test ) From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; Positive Symptoms Scale) From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; Composite Scale) From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in SOFAS (Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale) From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in DAI (Drug Attitudes Index) From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in AMSQ (Attitudes Toward Mood Stabilizers Questionnaire) From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in BARS (Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale) From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in ESRS-A (Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale-Abbreviated; Dystonia) From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in ESRS-A (Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale-Abbreviated; Akathisia)(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in Hospitalizations (Medical) in the Past 6 Months From Screen and Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Percentage Change of Days of Sub-optimal Housing in the Past Six Months; Change From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; Negative Symptoms Scale) From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; General Psychopathology) From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in ESRS-A (Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale-Abbreviated; Parkinsonism) From Screen to Week 25(Screen, Week 25)
  • Change in Hospitalizations (Psychiatric) in the Past 6 Months From Screen and Week 25(Screen, Week 25)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Martha Sajatovic

Professor of Psychiatry

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验