Comparison of Critical Flicker Fusion vs. Automated Visual Fields in the Detection of Early Glaucoma
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 58
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Difference of mean deviation of glaucoma suspects from controls between critical flicker fusion and automated visual fields.
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if critical flicker fusion is a more reliable method for detection of early glaucoma compared to automated visual fields in comparison to subjects without evidence of glaucoma or optic nerve disease.
详细描述
Our hypothesis is that critical flicker fusion (CFF) is a more reliable method for detection of early glaucoma compared to automated visual fields in comparison to subjects without evidence of glaucoma or optic nerve disease. We aim to evaluate the structure of the optic nerve and compare it to results of visual fields and CFF. The CFF will also be correlated with intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements to observe if it may be more closely related than visual fields. This may become an additional tool to detect glaucoma in those with unreliable visual fields or who are unable to perform a visual field from physical or mental limitations.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Difference of mean deviation of glaucoma suspects from controls between critical flicker fusion and automated visual fields.
时间窗: 1 visit (1 day)
次要结局
未报告次要终点