跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05780918
NCT05780918进行中(未招募)不适用

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Scenario Planning for Older Adults With Serious Injury

University of Wisconsin, Madison16 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 7,600 人开始时间: 2023年7月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
7,600
试验地点
16
主要终点
Family-reported Quality of Communication (QOC) within 5-7 days of ICU admission

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool on quality of communication, clinician moral distress, and ICU length of stay for older adults with serious traumatic injury. Investigators will follow an estimated 4500 patients aged 50 years and older who are in the ICU for 3 or more days and survey 1500 family members and up to 1600 clinicians from 8 sites nationwide.

详细描述

This is a multisite, stepped-wedge, randomized clinical trial. At the start of the study, investigators will randomly assign each site to the time when the intervention team will train all trauma surgeons, trainees, and ICU clinicians to use the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU tool. Participants in the intervention group will receive care from a trauma team that routinely uses the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool. Participants in the control group will receive usual care.

The study team will follow an estimated 4,500 patients with the highest post-injury mortality: aged 50 years and older with an ICU length of stay of 3 or more days. They will administer surveys to family members (quality of communication) and clinicians (moral distress) and obtain patient-level outcomes (ICU length of stay (LOS)), clinical data, and demographics from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) national registry.

Objectives:

  • Aim 1: To test the effectiveness of the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool on improving the quality of communication in the trauma ICU.
  • Aim 2: To test the effectiveness of the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool on reducing clinician moral distress in the ICU.
  • Aim 3: To test the effectiveness of the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool on reducing ICU length of stay.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • aged 50 and older
  • admitted to the ICU for 3 or more days after serious injury

排除标准

  • Family Members
  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • aged 18 and older
  • patient's family member or informally designated "like family" or primary surrogate decision maker
  • speak English or Spanish
  • Exclusion Criteria:
  • does not have decision-making capacity
  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • provide care in the trauma ICU (including attending trauma surgeons, fellows, residents, advance practice providers, bedside nurses and medical assistants, respiratory techs and physical therapists, social workers, and chaplains)
  • Exclusion Criteria:
  • do not provide care in the trauma ICU

研究组 & 干预措施

Best Case/Worst Case-ICU Communication Tool

Experimental

Patients in the intervention group will receive care from a trauma team that routinely uses the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool.

干预措施: Best Case/Worst Case-ICU Communication Tool (Other)

Usual Care

No Intervention

Prior to implementation of the intervention, patients admitted to the trauma ICU will receive usual care. Usual care typically includes conversations focused on isolated problems, disarticulated from the patient's overall health trajectory. This is typified by the systems-base review, routinely summarizing each patient on rounds where the clinician lists each physiologic system, (e.g., neuro, cardiac, pulmonary…) with an assessment and plan to "fix" each abnormality with a new treatment. Deliberation about how these individual treatments align with patient preferences is typically prompted by major events like failure to liberate from a ventilator or imminent death. This pattern of usual care is well characterized and differs from daily scenario planning with the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU communication tool.

结局指标

主要结局

Family-reported Quality of Communication (QOC) within 5-7 days of ICU admission

时间窗: up to 10 days after patient admission, one-time survey for family members

Family-reported quality of communication will be measured using the 20-item Quality of Communication (QOC) scale. The QOC is a validated self-report instrument. The average composite score will be given with a possible range of 0-10. Higher scores indicate higher perceived quality of communication.

次要结局

  • Patient Total Time on Ventilator(during hospitalization, provided by TQIP at study completion (estimated up to 2 years))
  • Family-reported proportion of Goal Concordant Care (GCC) at 5-7 days post ICU admission(up to 10 days after patient admission, one-time survey for family members)
  • Patient ICU Length of Stay (LOS)(during hospitalization, provided by TQIP at study completion (estimated up to 2 years))
  • Family-reported General Quality of Communication (QOC), within 5-7 days of ICU admission(up to 10 days after patient admission, one-time survey for family members)
  • Family-reported End-of-Life (EOL) Quality of Communication (QOC), within 5-7 days of ICU admission(up to 10 days after patient admission, one-time survey for family members)
  • Clinician-reported Emotional Exhaustion (EE) - Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)(3 months prior to each implementation wave and again 12 months later)
  • Clinician-reported Depersonalization (DP) - Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)(3 months prior to each implementation wave and again 12 months later)
  • Clinician-reported Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP)(3 months prior to each implementation wave and again 12 months later)
  • Clinician-reported Personal Accomplishment (PA) - Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)(3 months prior to each implementation wave and again 12 months later)
  • Patient 6-month Mortality(6 months after patient admission, provided by TQIP at study completion (estimated up to 2 years))
  • Patient Time to In-hospital Death(during hospitalization, provided by TQIP at study completion (estimated up to 2 years))
  • Patient Time to Withdrawal of Life Supporting Treatment(during hospitalization, provided by TQIP at study completion (estimated up to 2 years))

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (16)

Loading locations...

相似试验

A Communication Tool to Improve Communication in the... | 临床试验