NCT00802633终止不适用
Radical Cystectomy: Can We Improve Our Surgical Technique With the Ligasure Impact Tissue-Sealing Device?
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 终止
- 入组人数
- 80
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Estimated Blood Loss
研究概览
简要总结
Evaluate the utility/safety of an FDA-approved tissue sealing device during radical cystectomy as compared to an FDA-approved stapling device.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 19 Years 至 85 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Muscle invasive bladder cancer
- •Male/Female gender
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Estimated Blood Loss
时间窗: Perioperative
次要结局
- Operating Room Time in Minutes(Intraoperative time)
研究者
研究点 (2)
Loading locations...
相似试验
尚未招募
不适用
Benefit of Hemostatic Sealant in Preservation of Ovarian ReserveBenign Ovarian CystCystectomyNCT05037552University Hospital, Montpellier100
已完成
3 期
Ovarian Reserve After Ovarian Hemostasis by Floseal MatrixOvarian CystsNCT01857466CHA University100
已完成
不适用
Open Versus Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Totally Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion.Bladder CancerNCT03434132Regina Elena Cancer Institute116
进行中（未招募）
不适用
Robotic-assisted versus open removal of the bladder in bladder cancer patientsBladder cancerCancerISRCTN64538003Sahlgrenska University Hospital488
已完成
不适用
Open Vs Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized TrialBladder Cancer Requiring CystectomyNCT01157676University of Miami350