跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02281890
NCT02281890已完成不适用

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Suspected or Proven Sepsis: Secondary Analysis of INIS Trial Database

University of Edinburgh0 个研究点目标入组 3,493 人开始时间: 2001年10月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
3,493
主要终点
death or major disability

研究概览

简要总结

Neonatal sepsis is an important determinant of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. The investigators seek to investigate whether neurodevelopmental outcome following neonatal sepsis differs according to whether or not the diagnosis is confirmed by culture. In a secondary analysis of all 3493 infants included in the International Neonatal Immunotherapy Study (INIS) randomized controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for neonatal sepsis, the investigators will evaluate neurodevelopmental outcomes according to whether or not the sepsis was culture-proven. The primary outcome is death or major disability at two years. In secondary analyses the investigators will determine neurodevelopmental outcomes according to the causative organism identified. Greater understanding of the impact of culture-positivity on long-term outcomes in the setting of clinical neonatal sepsis is essential to better inform parents about the future prospects of their child and to guide patient follow-up.

详细描述

Rationale Neonatal sepsis is an important determinant of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome [Adams-Chapman 2006, Stoll 2004]. A recent meta-analysis estimated that neonatal sepsis more than doubled the risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants (OR 2.09 [95%CI 1.65-2.65]), including cerebral palsy (OR 2.09 [95%CI 1.78-2.45]).[Alshaikh 2013] When a baby with signs suggestive of sepsis, it is common practice to commence intravenous antibiotic treatment as soon as possible after cultures from blood and relevant additional sites have been obtained. However, cultures remain negative in an important subgroup of babies treated for sepsis, despite convincing clinical and/or laboratory signs of sepsis being present. Although there is some evidence to suggest that long-term outcomes following neonatal sepsis may differ according to whether or not the diagnosis was confirmed by culture,[Stoll 2004, Schlapbach 2011] to the best of the investigators' knowledge a direct comparison between these groups has never been made. Greater understanding of the impact of culture-positivity on long-term outcomes in the setting of clinical neonatal sepsis is essential to better inform parents about the future prospects of their child and to guide patient follow-up.

Objective Investigate differences in neurodevelopmental outcome at two years after neonatal sepsis according to whether or not the diagnosis was confirmed by culture.

Research questions Primary Are neurodevelopmental outcomes at two years different between babies with suspected versus culture-proven sepsis? Secondary Are neurodevelopmental outcomes at two years different between babies with suspected versus culture-proven sepsis when considered according to the underlying pathogen?

Design Secondary cohort analysis of all babies included in the International Neonatal Immunotherapy Study (INIS) randomized controlled trial (RCT).[INIS Study Collaborative Group 2008]

Study population The study population consists of all babies included in the INIS trial. The INIS trial was an RCT of intravenous immunoglobulin (two infusions of 500 mg/kg body weight polyvalent IgG) versus placebo in the treatment of suspected or proven neonatal sepsis.[INIS Study Collaborative Group 2008] 3493 infants were included from 113 hospitals in nine countries.[INIS Collaborative Group 2011] There was no difference between the treatment groups in the primary outcome of death or major disability at the age of two years (RR 1.00 [95%CI 0.92-1.08]), or in any of the secondary outcomes. Neither was an effect of immunoglobulin demonstrated in any of the pre-specified subgroup analyses. As the intervention under study did not have an impact on any of the outcomes, secondary observational analyses within the dataset are feasible.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
— 至 2 Years(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Children included in the INIS trial

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

death or major disability

时间窗: 2 years

Death or major disability at two years of age. The diagnosis of major disability was based on the answers to questions on the HSQ or the PQ \[see Study Description and INIS Collaborative Group 2011 (online supplement) for more detail\]. If the domain classification was unknown and a SHSQ had been received, the classification from that questionnaire was used for that domain only.

次要结局

  • disability due to seizures(two years)
  • communicative disability(two years)
  • cognitive disability(two years)
  • visual disability(two years)
  • death(two years)
  • disability(two years)
  • neuromotor disability(two years)
  • hearing disability(two years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验