Manikin Study of the Comparison of Two Different Resuscitation Devices (Neopuff and rPAP) During Simulated Resuscitation in the Neonatal Unit
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 20
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Percentage difference in expired tidal volumes produced by rPAP versus Neopuff resuscitation devices during simulated resuscitation using neonatal mannequins
研究概览
简要总结
There is a complex physiological process involved in establishing regular breaths at birth. After initiation of the first breath, fluid is removed from the alveoli and enough pressure must be generated to inflate the lungs . Most newborns will establish spontaneous regular breathing sufficient to maintain the heart rate above 100 beats/min and to improve perfusion within 3 minutes of birth. According to the neonatal resuscitation programme (NRP), if heart rate is below 100 or there is persistence of apnoea or gasping after the initial steps of drying/stimulation and oropharyngeal suction, intervention is required .
The main focus of neonatal resuscitation is effective ventilation to improve gas exchange and prevent respiratory failure. After birth, approximately 4% to 10% of term and late preterm newborns will receive help breathing with positive-pressure ventilation (PPV). Adequate mask ventilation is essential when providing breaths during neonatal resuscitation. However, this can be difficult, especially for less experienced staff and may be affected by inadequate seal of the mask, gas leaks and airway obstruction. In addition, trauma may be caused by the volumes being given during pressure controlled ventilation.
详细描述
Comparison of two different neonatal resuscitation devices (Neopuff and rPAP) in the Neonatal Unit in Cork University Maternity Hospital. Participants will use the devices on a mannequin. Performance of the two devices is judged by comparing the tidal volumes produced.
Participants will be recruited from the medical staff (Non-consultant Hospital Doctors and Consultants) of the neonatal unit.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Neonatology consultants and NCHD's from CUMH
- •Participants must have completed Neonatal Resuscitation Programme (NRP)
- •Participants must be working as doctors in the area of neonatology
排除标准
- •Any history of cardiac or respiratory disorder
- •Physicians who are post-call
结局指标
主要结局
Percentage difference in expired tidal volumes produced by rPAP versus Neopuff resuscitation devices during simulated resuscitation using neonatal mannequins
时间窗: 1 minutre
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Dr. Gene Dempsey
Principal Investigator
University College Cork
