Computer-Assisted Jaw Reconstruction Using 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Surgical Plates Versus Conventional Surgical Plates: A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial

This randomised controlled clinical trial was based on our previous clinical trial "Three-Dimensional Printing of Patient-Specific Titanium Plates in Jaw Surgery: A Pilot Study" (HKU/HA HKW IRB, No. UW 16-315; registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with a No. of NCT03057223; supported by HMRF Project no.: 05161626).

Over the past few decades, autologous vascularized bone flaps have become the preferred choice for head and neck reconstruction. The anastomosed blood supply endows vascularized bone flaps with improved survival rate and inherent anti-infection performance. Along with the development of microvascular surgery, surgeons are seeking more accurate reconstruction to enhance better aesthetic and functional outcomes. However, a main disadvantage of autologous bone flaps is the mismatch in the shape of donor bone, which need to be cut and trimmed to fit the defects and better restore the natural appearance. Much efforts have been devoted to facilitate bone manipulations, and then the computer-assisted surgery (CAS) emerged in the 21st century as a viable option. In CAS, surgeons do virtual plans in computer, which then guide the precise harvest and arrangement of bone segments for repairing defects in the operating theatre. Bone segments can be fine-navigated to best restore the original skeleton. In previous researches, various devices have been developed to navigate bone segments according to virtual plans, including cutting templates, skull models, and surgical navigation system.

However, the missing link between bone navigation and accurate reconstruction is the plate fixation procedure. In a conventional manner, bone segments are fixed using commercial off-the-shelf titanium plates, which should be manually bent and twisted to fit bone anatomy. The manual contouring process is often tedious and technique-demanding, and adversely affect the precise location of bone segments. What's worse, repeated bending can even lead to poor fatigue performance. The disadvantages of conventional surgical plates make it necessary to develop patient-specific surgical plates. Compared to conventional plates, patient-specific surgical plates are designed and manufactured in 3D structures aligned with individual bone contours. Instead of contouring plates based on anatomical structure of bones in conventional plates, patient-specific surgical plates navigate the folding and precise location of bone segments, and hopefully improve the accuracy of reconstruction. Meanwhile, since no plate bending is required, patient-specific surgical plates can be used to optimize bone reconstruction in a more efficient and standardized manner.

In recent years, with the rapid development of additive manufacturing (3D printing), it is now feasible to manufacture patient-specific metal implants with topologically optimized structures. Many efforts have been made to develop porous bone scaffolds for regenerative medicine, which are endowed with customized porosity to achieve optimal biomechanical properties. However, although additively manufactured bone scaffolds demonstrate excellent performance in some complicated cases, they still cannot replace the dominant role of autologous vascularized bone flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Therefore, it is of crucial importance to explore the application of additive manufactured (3D printed) patient-specific surgical plates, albeit not much research has been done in this direction.

In our previous study (HKU/HA HKW IRB, No. UW 16-315) supported by Health and Medical Research Fund (Project no.: 05161626), the investigators have successfully manufactured patient-specific titanium plates with high precision through selective laser melting (SLM) technology, which is a high-tech 3D printing technology that fully melts titanium powders into complete entities in the layer by layer manner. SLM enables the fabrication of patient-specific titanium surgical plates with tailored structures and outstanding biomechanical properties. Our results showed promising clinical outcomes in the application of 3D printed patient-specific titanium plates in head and neck reconstruction. Furthermore, the investigators did a retrospective study comparing the patients who had undergone jaw reconstructive surgery using 3D printed patient-specific surgical plates versus conventional titanium plates and the result showed superior accuracy of reconstruction outcomes in the study group with the use of 3D printed patient-specific surgical plates. However, there were significant limitations in our study. First, as a retrospective study, the innate flaw of study design was unavoidable, such as selection bias. Second, there was significantly difference in follow-up periods between the study group and control group. The imaging data used for accuracy analysis were obtained during different post-operative periods, which compromised the final outcomes. Finally, surgical efficiency endpoints, such as operation time, blood loss, and post-operative hospital stay, which could be significantly affected by multiple confounding factors, are difficult to control by retrospective study design. Hence, there is still lack of high-level evidence concerning the advantages of 3D printed patient-specific surgical plates in head and neck reconstruction. Whether 3D printed patient-specific surgical plates improve surgical accuracy and efficiency compared to conventional plates in computer assisted jaw reconstruction should be further investigated before large-scale clinical application.