跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02701179
NCT02701179已完成不适用

Comparison of 1% Versus 2% Lignocaine for Topical Anaesthesia in Flexible Bronchoscopy

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 500 人开始时间: 2016年4月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
500
试验地点
1
主要终点
Operator rated overall procedure satisfaction VAS

研究概览

简要总结

Flexible bronchoscopy is one of the most widely performed procedures for diagnosis of various bronchopulmonary diseases. Most patients tolerate the procedure well although cough is often reported as a distressing symptom. It is likely that the acceptance of bronchoscopy would be significantly improved with control of cough. Use of sedation during bronchoscopy has been reported to improve procedure tolerance. However, awake(no sedation) bronchoscopy is routinely performed at many centres including ours.

Topical lignocaine is administered during bronchoscopy for local anaesthesia. There is limited literature on the efficacy of lower concentrations (1%) versus a higher (2%) during bronchoscopic procedures. This study would help to determine whether 1% lignocaine is as effective as 2% lignocaine for airway anaesthesia during flexible bronchoscopy.

详细描述

For all patients meeting the inclusion criteria, the demographic profile including age, sex, weight, smoking history and the type of procedures performed during bronchoscopy shall be recorded. A written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The patients who undergo flexible bronchoscopy would be randomised in a one is to one ratio either to 1% lignocaine or 2% lignocaine group. Prior to the bronchoscopy blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate and pulse oximetry saturation will be recorded at the baseline Patients in both the groups shall be prepared in a similar fashion except for the concentration of lignocaine used. Two different concentration of lignocaine solution will be labelled as solution 'A' or solution 'B' containing either of 1% or 2% lignocaine solution .Operator will be provided either solution A or B based on the initial randomisation.

During the procedure, 1.5ml aliquots of the provided lignocaine solution will be delivered through the bronchoscope using spray-as-you go technique. The total number of aliquots used during the procedure will be recorded. The patients would be monitored for any adverse effects throughout the procedure. The bronchoscopist doing the procedure will be provided 2 VAS charts to mark the severity of cough and overall procedure satisfaction.

Post procedure, patients will record the pain experienced while undergoing the procedure on the faces pain rating scale.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Indication for diagnostic or therapeutic flexible bronchoscopy
  • Age > 18 years
  • Hemodynamic stability (defined as systolic BP >100 mm Hg and, <180 mm Hg).

排除标准

  • Refusal of consent
  • Known documented hypersensitivity to lignocaine
  • Procedure performed under general anaesthesia or sedation
  • Hypoxemia (oxygen saturation [by pulse oximetry] < 92% with Fio2 of ≥ 0.3
  • Bronchoscopy done through endotracheal or tracheostomy tube

研究组 & 干预措施

1 % Lignocaine

Active Comparator

1 % Lignocaine administered for topical anaesthesia during bronchoscopy procedure

干预措施: Lignocaine 1% concentration solution (Drug)

2 % Lignocaine

Active Comparator

2 % Lignocaine administered for topical anaesthesia during bronchoscopy procedure

干预措施: Lignocaine 2% concentration solution (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Operator rated overall procedure satisfaction VAS

时间窗: At study completion approximately 12 months

Operator rated cough VAS

时间窗: At study completion approximately 12 months

次要结局

  • Total lignocaine dose administered(At study completion approximately 12 months)
  • Patient facies pain rating scale(At study completion approximately 12 months)
  • Procedure related adverse events(At study completion approximately 12 months)

研究者

发起方
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Karan Madan

Dr Karan Madan, MD, DM. Assistant Professor, Pulmonary Medicine and Sleep Disorders

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验