跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02734485
NCT02734485已完成不适用

The Use of Deep TMS for the Treatment and Rehabilitation of Patients With Parkinson's Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

IRCCS San Raffaele Roma2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2013年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
20
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change in PSP rating scale total score between baseline evaluations (T0 orT2) and end of treatment (T1 or T3)

研究概览

简要总结

Background: Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a rare neuro-degenerative disease, counted among atypical parkinsonism (AP). Medical treatment and rehabilitation are extremely limited in AP, therefore it would be very useful to find new ways to improve motor and non motor symptoms in PSP. The Brainway Deep Transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) is a new technology of TMS using a particular coil, i.e. H-coil, able to stimulate deeper regions of the brain. Only few studies in literature have evaluated the efficacy of DTMS in Parkinson's Disease and parkinsonism; in particular in PSP patients, a case report showed an improvement in language.

详细描述

Materials and Methods

This study was a pilot, randomized, cross-over, double blind trial. It was designed to evaluate the efficacy of Deep TMS in terms of recovery of motor functions, freezing of gait, and cognitive decline in patients with PSP. Nineteen subject underwent 14 session of high frequency DTMS over a 4 weeks period. The target were the left Broca and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
30 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • outpatients with PSP according to NINDS-SPSP criteria

排除标准

  • contraindications for DTMS (history of seizures, pacemakers, or any other electric device)

结局指标

主要结局

Change in PSP rating scale total score between baseline evaluations (T0 orT2) and end of treatment (T1 or T3)

时间窗: evaluation time (pre-stimulation: T0 for first period, T2 for second period; post-stimulation (after four weeks of treatment): T1 for first period, T3 for second period).

Clinical measures were summarized as means and standard deviations for all the 19 patients and stratified by treatment (active and sham) and evaluation time (pre-stimulation: T0 for first period, T2 for second period; post-stimulation: T1 for first period, T3 for second period).

次要结局

  • Change in NMS total score between baseline evaluations (T0 orT2) and end of treatment (T1 or T3)(evaluation time (pre-stimulation: T0 for first period, T2 for second period; post-stimulation (after four weeks of treatment): T1 for first period, T3 for second period)
  • Change in MoCA total score between baseline evaluations (T0 orT2) and end of treatment (T1 or T3)(evaluation time (pre-stimulation: T0 for first period, T2 for second period; post-stimulation (after four weeks of treatment): T1 for first period, T3 for second period)
  • Change in PDQ 39 total score between baseline evaluations (T0 orT2) and end of treatment (T1 or T3)(evaluation time (pre-stimulation: T0 for first period, T2 for second period; post-stimulation (after four weeks of treatment): T1 for first period, T3 for second period)
  • Change in Hamilton rating scale for depression total score between baseline evaluations (T0 orT2) and end of treatment (T1 or T3)(evaluation time (pre-stimulation: T0 for first period, T2 for second period; post-stimulation (after four weeks of treatment): T1 for first period, T3 for second period)

研究者

发起方
IRCCS San Raffaele Roma
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验