Comparison of Early Exercise Intervention Versus Late Exercise Intervention on Pain and Neurodynamic Mobility Following Unilateral Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The direction of treatment for low back pain both surgically and conservatively seeks to improve function in both daily and sporting activities for all patients. The patients continuing to suffer from a significant level of pain, disability and reduced function following single level microdiscectomy may benefit from a multi-factorial approach. A reduction in neurodynamic mobility related to dural adhesions is considered to be a contributing factor in this persistent peripheral neuropathic pain. The clinical efficacy of this study will address an exercise protocol post surgery in order to provide an optimal approach in the prevention of scar tissue that may be contributing to persistent pain post microdiscectomy. Mobility and motor control impairments are considered the consequence to the onset of pain. Education, neurodynamics and stabilization exercises are instrumental in the recovery post microdiscectomy with a reduction in pain and disability and the goal towards full functioning. The introduction of a neurodynamic protocol as an early exercise intervention may serve to reduce pain inhibition resulting with improved mobility and motor control. The recording of step count per day following a lumbar microdiscectomy will serve to document daily and physical activity levels following surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not there is a significant difference in pain levels and lumbar mobility between an early exercise intervention group versus a late exercise intervention group post microdiscectomy.