跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03433729
NCT03433729已完成不适用

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of an Agenda Setting Form in a Respiratory Outpatient Clinic: Are Patients More Likely to Perceive That Their Important Issues Are Discussed and Does the Form Improve Clinic Efficiency?

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 165 人开始时间: 2014年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
165
试验地点
2
主要终点
The proportion of patients who, on leaving their outpatient appointment, strongly agree with the statement "My doctor discussed the issues that were important to me" where options are strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree.

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of the study is to determine whether patients who use a prompt sheet to identify their important issues before they see a doctor are more likely to feel that their important issues have been discussed during their consultation. The study will be conducted in a respiratory outpatient clinic.

详细描述

Evidence suggests that most patients come to a consultation with issues they wish to raise, but they may not actually raise them and clinicians may not elicit them. This can adversely affect the consultation outcome, e.g. through misunderstandings, unwanted prescriptions, non-adherence and unnecessary follow-ups. In a review of methods used before consultations to help patients address their information needs Kinnersely et al. (2009) found that there were small but statistically significant increases in patient satisfaction and the number of questions patients asked, and no effect on consultation length. However, they identified several gaps in the evidence including the need to assess a wider range of outcome measures, to identify the impact of the methods on the types of questions asked and the need to measure consultation length accurately.

This study aims to assess the impact of a written agenda form in a respiratory outpatient clinic. The form prompts the patient to identify their questions and issues, provides a list of frequently asked questions and invites the patient to write down the issues they wish to discuss with their doctor. We wish to identify whether use of the form increases the extent to which patients perceive that their important issues are discussed in the consultation. We will also assess whether patients feel more able to raise these issues and get the outcome they wanted, their confidence to manage their condition and consultation length.

The study is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a sample size of 158 patients. On arrival at the clinic patients will be randomly allocated to either the intervention group (who will receive an agenda form) or to standard practice. Patient reported outcomes will be collected after the patient has seen the doctor and consultation times will be recorded by an independent observer outside the consultation room.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • have an outpatient appointment at one of the designated clinics
  • are able to understand the Patient Information Sheet and complete the agenda form and the feedback form, or are accompanied by a person who meets this criteria and who is willing to complete the form on the patient's behalf
  • willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study

排除标准

  • No further criteria apply

研究组 & 干预措施

Patient Agenda Form

Experimental

Patient Agenda form: Patients receive an agenda form to use before their consultation.

干预措施: Patient agenda form (Other)

Usual care

No Intervention

Patients' appointment continues as usual.

结局指标

主要结局

The proportion of patients who, on leaving their outpatient appointment, strongly agree with the statement "My doctor discussed the issues that were important to me" where options are strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree.

时间窗: Immediately after consultation with the doctor

次要结局

  • The proportion of patients who strongly agree with the statement "I felt able to raise issues that were important to me with my doctor" where options are strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree(Immediately after consultation with the doctor)
  • The proportion of patients who strongly agree with the statement "I got the outcome I wanted from my consultation" where options are strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree.(Immediately after consultation with the doctor)
  • Length of consultation(Immediately after consultation with the doctor)
  • Patient confidence to manage their condition following the consultation, rated on a scale of 0-10 where 0 equals no confidence and 10 equals maximum confidence(Immediately after consultation with the doctor)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Jonathan Fuld

Consultant Physician

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Patient Agenda Setting and Clinic Efficiency in... | 临床试验