跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01582841
NCT01582841已完成不适用

Integrating Genetic Testing for Lynch Syndrome in a Managed Care Setting

Kaiser Permanente2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 247 人开始时间: 2012年2月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
247
试验地点
2
主要终点
Implementation effectiveness

研究概览

简要总结

The investigators research mobilizes the resources of an integrated health-delivery system with extensive electronic clinical data to implement and evaluate a new strategy to maximize screening of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) patients for Lynch Syndrome.

详细描述

Screening tests for Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) [also called Lynch Syndrome], are among the few available validated genetic tests that have been recommended as an evidence-based practice that can save lives. However, more than half of patients who meet well-established and accepted screening criteria do not receive screening. This is a critical failure for patients and for the health-care delivery system because HNPCC mutation carriers are at exceptionally high risk for colorectal and other HNPCC-related cancers, and because clinical strategies can prevent future cancers, or provide early detection, for individuals affected with HNPCC and their relatives. HNPCC testing is also cost-effective compared to treating individuals with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC).

To address this shortfall in practice, our proposed research mobilizes the resources of an integrated health-delivery system with extensive electronic clinical data to implement and evaluate a new strategy to maximize screening of CRC patients for HPNCC. The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) working group recommended that all newly diagnosed CRC patients be screened for HPNCC, but was not able to recommend a best-strategy to accomplish this aim. Therefore, using the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM), developed by one of our co-investigators, to guide the analyses, the investigators will:

Aim #1: Conduct a randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a universal laboratory test-based HNPCC screening program compared to the current practice of physician referral and self-referral.

Aim #2: Elucidate patient, provider, and system factors important to success of implementation.

Aim #3: (revised and approved during year 1): To create, refine, and disseminate an implementation guide for HNPCC screening by combining the results from Aims 1-2 and the perspectives from informant interviews of key staff at future diverse dissemination-implementation sites: Case Western Reserve University, Oregon Health & Sciences University, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, and Safety Net West Clinics. Addition to Aim 3: We will contribute materials to the LSSN website for dissemination of implementation materials.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Screening
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • At least 18 years old
  • Kaiser Permanente member
  • Referral or scheduled colon surgery
  • No known cognitive impairments (e.g., Alzheimer's Disease) that would impact the ability to be consented
  • English speaker
  • Diagnosis of colon cancer

排除标准

  • Under the age of 18
  • Known cognitive impairment
  • Inability to speak/understand English
  • On the research exclusion list
  • Known Lynch syndrome
  • No diagnosis of colon cancer

结局指标

主要结局

Implementation effectiveness

时间窗: All patients will be followed up to 5 years. Most active participation and chart review will take place within one year of surgery.

The primary outcomes to assess implementation effectiveness are: number of patients who receive HNPCC screening test results; number of physicians who receive their patients HPNCC screening test results; completion of the educational session at three months of follow-up; and number of patients with MSI-H (microsatellite instability-high) test results who are contacted by medical genetics.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验