A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Rochester Forensic Assertive Community Treatment Model in Minnesota
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 40
- 试验地点
- 1
研究概览
简要总结
This study evaluates the Rochester Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (R-FACT) model in Minnesota. R-FACT is an enhanced version of Assertive Community Treatment designed to support individuals with serious mental illness who are involved in the criminal justice system.
Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the R-FACT intervention or standard outpatient mental health services. The study examines whether R-FACT reduces criminal justice involvement, improves mental health outcomes, and enhances community functioning compared to usual care over a 24-month follow-up period.
详细描述
The R-FACT intervention includes a multidisciplinary team approach with reduced caseloads, enhanced supervision, and collaboration with criminal justice stakeholders.
This randomized controlled trial evaluates the effectiveness of the Rochester Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (R-FACT) model in Minnesota. R-FACT is a modified Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model developed to address the needs of individuals with serious mental illness who are at high risk for criminal justice involvement. The model integrates best practices in community mental health (high-fidelity ACT) with best practices in community correctional supervision (Probation officers trained in Effective Practices in Community Supervision - EPICS) The study was conducted across two counties in Minnesota and enrolled adults with serious mental illness who were on probation or undergoing correctional facility release to probation. Participants were randomized to either the R-FACT intervention or standard outpatient mental health treatment.
The R-FACT intervention consists of a high-fidelity ACT team that collaborates closely with specially assigned probation officers who provide community correctional oversight of all R-FACT service recipients. The comparator group received usual care through existing outpatient mental health services along with standard probation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
盲法说明
This study was open-label. Participants and care providers were aware of treatment assignment due to the nature of the intervention. Outcome data were obtained from administrative databases, reducing the risk of assessment bias.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age 18 or older.
- •DSM-5 diagnosis of a psychotic disorder, including schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or major depression with psychotic features.
- •Adequate command of English to understand study instructions.
- •Capacity to provide informed consent.
- •Under community correctional supervision or undergoing prison release planning at the time of enrollment.
排除标准
- •Age under
- •Lack of a psychotic disorder diagnosis.
- •Inability to speak English.
- •Lack of capacity to provide informed consent.
- •Absence of community correctional supervision or of release planning.
- •Presence of legal oversight in the community from a source other than probation or community corrections. Examples include having legal oversight from a mental health court, a drug court, or from an assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) program.
研究者
Steven Lamberti
Professor - Department of Psychiatry, Administration (SMD)
University of Rochester