Intimate Partner Violence and a New Screening Score - a Prospective Observational Study Over Eight Years

All cases with association to IPV during inclusion period. 40 individuals had to be excluded due to missing data resulting in 1.366 individuals that were included in our analysis. Patients were identified from hospital in-patient enquiry system and in-house screening service for IPV. The IPV in-house screening service was established in 2008, and our Department represents a leading figure in detection and servicing victims of domestic violence. Our IPV in-house screening service is a routine procedure established 24/7 at clinics for all admitted patients.

If the slightest suspicion rose up, patients were asked by the attending physician or nurse, in a private and respectful manner, if a certainty of IPV exists, related to the actual presentation. If the patient admits the fact of IPV, this is noted in the hospital in-patient enquiry system, and a notification is sent to the local police station - as required by Austrian law. Part of our IPV in-house screening service, is the admission to the victim protection program and photographic documentation for legal utilization on behalf of the victim in an upcoming law claim, both services can be joined voluntarily by the victims.

Classification of migration background Patients´ clinical and demographic data were retrieved from our database. Migration background was defined according to current law (MighEV §6, Sozialgesetzbuch). In detail this means that migration background is fulfilled, if (1) the person does not possesses the national citizenship, or (2) the origin of birth is outside the borders of the national country, and emigration to the national territory was after 1949, or (3) origin of birth of one of the two parents is outside the current borders of the national territory plus emigration of one of the two parents occured after 1949.

The reason for using German law in an Austrian study is justified by a more practical and veridical approach of the German law in this particular matter. The corresponding Austrian law for defining migration background is almost identical, except for (3), where compared to Germany both parents have to be affected instead of one. The reason for explaining this matter in such a detail is to avoid any misleading conclusions, based on false assumptions.

Study population was divided into the following sub-groups: patients with migration background (MB), and patients without migration background (NMB), according to data retrieved from patient's medical records and inclusion criteria.