跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03106103
NCT03106103已完成不适用

Incidence of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Bacteriuria After Urodynamic Study With or Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Women With Urinary Incontinence

Federal University of São Paulo0 个研究点目标入组 217 人开始时间: 2009年2月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
217
主要终点
Incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic bacteriuria after urodynamic study in women with urinary incontinence

研究概览

简要总结

Urodynamic Study (UDS) represents a series of agreed-upon clinical tests and is used to evaluate the functional status of the lower urinary tract, providing a pathophysiological basis for urinary symptoms. Urodynamic Study involves catheterization of the lower urinary tract. The prevalence of urinary tract infection after UDS ranges from 1,5% to 30 %.

Studies of prophylactic antibiotics for UDSs have offered data of contradictory and limited predictive values. Some investigators concluded that prophylactic antibiotics were valuable and others have not.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis before UDS in women, using different antibiotic regimens.

详细描述

This study is randomized, double blind study was carried out in the Department of Gynecology at Sao Paulo Federal University from January 2009 to December 2012.

The patients were randomized in four groups: Group A received 500mg of levofloxacin, group B received placebo, group C received 80mg trimethoprim and 400mg sulfamethoxazole (SMZ-TMP) and group D received 100mg of nitrofurantoin. The tablets were administered 30 minutes before de UDS.

All patients were instructed to collect midstream urine sample to the microbiology laboratory 14 days after the UDS. Significant bacteriuria was considered when >1.000.000 organisms/mL of a single species was isolated.

All data were entered into Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 16.0 for statistical analysis and graphic representation. Likelihood -ratio test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the prevalence of significant bacteriuria after UDS in the different groups and Student's t-test and ANOVA test were used to compare continuous variables. To compare the groups regarding the BMI variable and parity, the model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used, or if necessary, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test and to compare the groups in relation to menopause variable, we used the Chi-square test. A significance level of 0.05 was established for statistical analysis.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 82 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Women with 20 to 85 years old, clinical diagnosis of urinary incontinence with indication for urodynamic study, absence of genital prolapse or prolapse peak effort that does not exceed the hymen, absence of urinary tract infection

排除标准

  • Patients with diabetes mellitus, history of recurrence urinary tract infection, with genital prolapse that exceed de hymen, pregnant, kidney stone, allergy to antibiotics, use of urethral catheters delay

结局指标

主要结局

Incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic bacteriuria after urodynamic study in women with urinary incontinence

时间窗: 24 months

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Federal University of São Paulo
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Elizabeth Yukie Hirakauva

doctor

Federal University of São Paulo

相似试验