跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2018/04/013056
CTRI/2018/04/013056已完成不适用

Effect of Backward Walking In addition To Conventional Therapy On Back Function In patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain

Sancheti Institute College of Physiotherapy1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2016年3月22日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
Pain - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

研究概览

简要总结

Background: Mechanical low back pain (LBP) is one of the major cause of illness and disability, especially in people of working age, in which there is deformation of structures containing nociceptive nerve endings and having direct correlation between certain body positions and the patient’s symptoms. Individuals with mechanical low back pain usually present with limited low back range of motion (ROM) and reduced flexibility thus resulting in limitation in their function. Aim of most of the therapeutic interventions for mechanical back pain is to achieve pain relief, adequate flexibility and improve ROM of the spine.

NEED FOR STUDY

The source of symptoms in mechanical LBP is not completely understood. This increases the complexity of the diagnosis and also poses as a challenge for treatment of mechanical LBP. The current treatment techniques employed by physical therapists to manage mechanical LBP include various electrotherapeutic modalities, thermotherapy, mobilizations, manipulations, stretching, orthotics, posture correction, ergonomics followed by introduction of light exercises[10, 25-29]. Beyond the success of these physical therapy interventions there is still a lack of integrated treatment modalities for further progression. Backward walking can possibly bridge this gap and thus help in improving function in patients with mechanical low back pain. Despite the above findings backward walking, has not received a thorough scientific analysis with respect to its effectiveness in reducing pain and improving function and low back ROM in patients with mechanical LBP. Therefore, in this study we intend to examine whether treadmill backward walking in addition to conventional therapy can reduce low back pain and improve overall back function in patients with mechanical LBP.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

AIM To study the effect of backward walking in addition to conventional therapy on pain, low back ROM and overall back function in patients with mechanical low back pain. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study are to examine the following in patients with mechanical LBP: 1) the effectiveness of backward walking i.e Experimental group on pain intensity, low back ROM (coronal and sagittal plane) and overall back function 2) the effectiveness of conventional therapy i.e Control group on pain intensity, low back ROM and overall back function 3) to compare the findings of both the groups. RESEARCH QUESTION Does treadmill backward walking have an additional effect on pain, low back ROM and overall back function in patients with mechanical low back pain?

HYPOTHESIS AND NULL HYPOTHESIS HYPOTHESIS Treadmill backward walking intervention in addition to conventional therapy will have a beneficial effect on overall back function in patients with mechanical LBP. NULL HYPOTHESIS Treadmill backward walking intervention along with conventional therapy will not have any additional effect on overall back function in patients with mechanical LBP.

RESULTS

The results of this study indicate that backward walking along with conventional therapy has shown statistically significant reduction in LBP and improvement in back function as compared to conventional therapy alone.

CONCLUSION

The present study concluded that -Backward walking is effective in relieving pain, improving function and increasing low back ROM in patients with mechanical low back pain. -Conventional therapy is effective in relieving pain, improving function and increasing low back ROM in patients with mechanical low back pain. -However, treadmill backward walking in addition to conventional therapy has shown better effects than conventional therapy alone in alleviating pain and improving overall back function in patients with mechanical low back pain.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
20.00 Year(s) 至 40.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • •VAS 4-7 (moderate intensity).

排除标准

  • •Lower extremity soft tissue injuries in last 6 months.
  • •Lower extremity fractures in last 1 year.
  • •Spinal surgery in last 3 years.
  • •Balance impairments.
  • •Spinal tumour or infection, spinal instability, spondylolisthesis, spinal canal stenosis, lumbar radiculopathy, discogenic back pain, SI joint dysfunction.

结局指标

主要结局

Pain - Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

时间窗: Baseline | Immediately after 2 weeks of intervention

Low back ROM - sagittal and coronal plane ROM (i.e lumbar flexion, extension and side flexion) – Dual Inclinometer

时间窗: Baseline | Immediately after 2 weeks of intervention

Back Function – Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (Modified ODQ

时间窗: Baseline | Immediately after 2 weeks of intervention

次要结局

  • Not applicable(Not applicable)

研究者

发起方
Sancheti Institute College of Physiotherapy
申办方类型
Research institution and hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验