Comparison of Lymph Node Dissection Results and Prognosis in Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma Without Cervical Lymph Node Involvement: Two-field Versus Three-field Lymph Node Dissection

Esophageal carcinoma is a prevalent and aggressive malignant disease with poor prognosis in China. Complete surgical resection with systemic lymph node dissection remains the most effective treatment method for this malignancy. Although tree-field lymph node dissection was reported to be effective in improving long-term survival in Japan,there is no enough evidences yet to demonstrate that three field lymph node dissection is superior to two field lymph node dissection in reducing postoperative recurrence and improving long-term survival. In this study, the dissection of lymph node adjacent to the right recurrent laryngeal nerve would be performed and examined routinely by intraoperative frozen-section. If the lymph node is positive, three field lymph node dissection(Cervical-thoracic-upper abdominal lymphadenectomy) will be performed, if negative, the patients will be randomly assigned either to three-field lymphadenectomy group or two-field lymphadenectomy group. The purpose of this large scale multi-center trial is to compare the lymph node dissection results and prognosis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma without cervical lymph node involvement treated by three-field lymphadenectomy or two-field lymphadenectomy and clarify whether the lymph node along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve could be taken as sentinel lymph node indicating neck lymph node metastasis and necessity of three-field lymphadenectomy.