跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04082624
NCT04082624已完成不适用

Workplace Wellness: Improving Your Experience at Work

University of Victoria2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 116 人开始时间: 2014年9月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
116
试验地点
2
主要终点
Sitting time

研究概览

简要总结

The primary objective of study was to compare affective (i.e., highlighted emotional benefits), instrumental (i.e., highlighted other health benefits), and self-regulation (i.e., demonstrated ways to plan, set goals, etc.) interventions in terms of their ability to motivate less sitting in the workplace. Research of this type is important because people sit for long periods of time at work which adversely affects their health and productivity.

It was hypothesized that the affective and self-regulation groups would sit less than the instrumental and control groups based on evidence indicating that affective attitude (i.e., emotional evaluation of the behavior) and self-regulation techniques tend to predict behavior.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • From a local workplace in Victoria
  • Full-time employee (i.e., greater than 35 hours per week)
  • Reported over 5.5 hours of sitting per day at work
  • Agreed to attend the 3 intervention sessions

排除标准

  • Not from a local workplace in Victoria
  • Not a full-time employee (i.e., 35 hours or less per week)
  • Reported less than 5.5 hours of sitting per day at work
  • Did not agree to attend the 3 intervention sessions

研究组 & 干预措施

Nutrition condition

Active Comparator

Received nutrition information such as the comparison of nutritional information between orange juice and soda pop. Received intervention following measurements at baseline, week 4, and week 8.

干预措施: Nutrition condition (Behavioral)

Affective condition

Experimental

Learned about the affective benefits (e.g., less depression) of reduced office sitting time through taking active breaks. Received intervention following measurements at baseline, week 4, and week 8.

干预措施: Affective condition (Behavioral)

Instrumental condition

Experimental

Learned about instrumental benefits such as the relationship between sitting and cardiovascular disease and absenteeism at work. Received intervention following measurements at baseline, week 4, and week 8.

干预措施: Instrumental condition (Behavioral)

Self-regulation condition

Experimental

Learned how to self-monitor their sedentary behavior and active breaks. They also learned how to create prompts/cues (e.g., sticky note reminder), problem solve to overcome barriers, action plan (i.e., specifying when, where, and how to do the behavior), and set goals in order to be less sedentary according to SMART (i.e., specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, time-oriented) principles. Received intervention following measurements at baseline, week 4, and week 8.

干预措施: Self-regulation condition (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Sitting time

时间窗: Twelve weeks post-baseline

Average hours of sitting time per day at work

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ryan Rhodes

Primary investigator

University of Victoria

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验