NL-OMON28202招募中不适用
Wallflex versus Egis stent for palliation of malignant dysphagia’
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 入组人数
- 116
研究概览
简要总结
/A
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •Dysphagia due to an inoperable malignant obstruction of the esophagus or gastric cardia.
- •Dysphagia is defined as: dysphagia score of 2-4, according to Ogilvie
排除标准
- •-Evidence of tumor growth within 2 cm of the upper esophageal sphincter
- •-Tumor length > 12 cm
研究者
相似试验
已完成
4 期
Wallflex stent versus Egis stent for palliation of malignant dysphagiamalignant dysphagiacancerous passage disorder10017990NL-OMON40496niversitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht116
已完成
4 期
A Trial Comparing a Paclitaxel Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer Versus a Bare Metal StentCoronary Artery DiseaseNCT00825279Centro de estudios en Cardiologia Intervencionista300
已完成
不适用
Randomized comparison of paclitaxel eluting stent versus conventional stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.PATIENTS UNDERGOING PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS INTERVENTION FOR ACUTE ST-SEGEMENT MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION.NL-OMON25456Amsterdam Department of Interventional Cardiology (ADIC)620
终止
不适用
BATTLE Trial: Bare Metal Stent Versus Paclitaxel Eluting Stent in the Setting of Primary Stenting of Intermediate Length Femoropopliteal LesionsPeripheral Arterial DiseaseFemoropopliteal LesionsNCT02004951Nantes University Hospital186
尚未招募
不适用
Paclitaxel-eluting stent versus conventional stent in STE-myocardial infarction; angiographic long-term evaluation;Long-term angiographic follow-up after primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction; paclitaxel-eluting stent versus bare metal stent, as performed in the PASSION trial A single blinded, randomized, dual center studyarteriosclerosiscoronary artery disease10011082NL-OMON30693Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis300