跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00121654
NCT00121654Unknown4 期

Randomized Study on SCS for the Treatment of Refractory Angina Pectoris

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2005年7月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
4 期
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Reduction of angina symptoms

研究概览

简要总结

The study aims at assessing safety and efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris in a single blind, prospective, multicenter study.

Sixty patients with refractory angina with new SCS device implantation will be randomized to one of three treatment groups:

  • paresthesic SCS;
  • subliminal SCS;
  • low (non effective) stimulation (control).

Clinical follow-up will be done at 1 and 3 months. Control group patients will then be randomized to paresthesic SCS or subliminal SCS for another 3 months and the 2 groups will be reassessed at 6 months.

详细描述

Aim of the study is to assess safety and efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris in a single blind, prospective, multicenter study. The study also assesses whether subliminal SCS may be as effective as paresthesic SCS in these patients.

Sixty consecutive patients with refractory angina with a new SCS device implantation will be randomized to one of three treatment groups:

  • paresthesic SCS (group 1);
  • subliminal SCS (75-80% of paresthesic threshold; group 2);
  • low stimulation, consisting of an hour of SCS a day at 0.05 mV intensity, which does not have any significant stimulator effect (sham stimulation, group 3).

Study Procedure

Medical history, clinical data, drug therapy, Angina Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification, Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), quality of life estimation by EuroQoL scale, detailed evaluation of angina attacks (frequency, intensity, duration of episodes; nitrates assumption) according to a structured diary, number of hospitalizations, emergency room (ER) admissions and cardiological visits in the previous 6 months and treadmill exercise stress test results will be obtained at the baseline visit.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 90 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Stable angina pectoris refractory to optimal medical therapy, with at least 10 angina episodes in the three weeks previous SCS implant;
  • Documentation of coronary artery disease and reversible myocardial ischaemia;
  • Patient is not a candidate for or refuses surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization;
  • Availability for follow-up visits;
  • Written informed consent.

排除标准

  • Severe spinal cord diseases that prevent the catheter positioning in the epidural space;
  • No paresthesic coverage of angina pain area during SCS;
  • Unstable angina pectoris;
  • Female patients in fertile age;
  • Enrolment in other studies;
  • Need for anticoagulant therapy;
  • Patients needing diathermy treatment;
  • Life expectancy <12 months.

结局指标

主要结局

Reduction of angina symptoms

时间窗: 1, 3, 6 and 12 months

improvement of quality of life

时间窗: 1, 3, 6 and 12 months

次要结局

  • evaluation of adverse events and complications(0, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months)
  • Improvement of exercise induced myocardial ischemia(3, 6 and 12 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验