跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05211999
NCT05211999已完成不适用

The Effect of Precede-Proceed Model Based Simulation Experience in Needlestick and Sharps Injuries Among Nurses

Acibadem University2 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 67 人开始时间: 2021年9月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
67
试验地点
2
主要终点
Recognition of Educational Best Practices in Simulation

研究概览

简要总结

Healthcare workers are exposed to many important risks that will negatively affect their health in their working environment. Among these risks, the most important threat is needlestick injuries. Needlestick injuries in healthcare workers with work-related injuries among studies, and the prevalence of injury remains high. In a study conducted by Gheshlagh et al. (2018), the prevalence of needlestick injuries in health workers was found to be 42.5%. It has been shown in studies conducted that the most common decision needlestick injuries among health workers are in nurses. In preventing injuries, preventing, and controlling negative behaviors related to the safe use of needlestick tools is among the most important strategies. In addition, the use of evidence obtained from interventional studies to prevent needlestick injuries in protection programs also plays an important role in prevention.

The importance of frequent and regular education about the subject has been mentioned especially in the studies conducted to prevent injuries. The World Health Organization (WHO) has published gold standards in the education of nurses and has recommended the use of electronic learning and simulation methods in the programs of nursing schools for learning and teaching according to these standards. It is important to use evidence-based practices to increase quality and competence by creating realistic clinical environments in nursing education. In this context, it is possible to use simulation-based experiences for educational purposes without exposure to infection control and employee safety in the clinical field.

In a study conducted by Nakamura et al. (2019), it was found that a simulation-based training program was effective in infection control. Due to the limited number of studies aimed at protecting the health of healthcare workers and controlling infection, more simulation-based studies are needed in this area. In addition, conducting model-based studies in developing behavior in health workers will also increase success. One of these models, the Precede-Process Model, is an important guide for users in assessing the social, epidemiological, behavioral, and environmental spheres of society for planning and evaluating programs. In summary, the aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of the Precede-Process Model-based simulation training program on preventing needlestick injuries in nurses who are the occupational group most exposed to injury.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 0-1 years of experience in the profession,
  • Nurses who volunteered to participate in the study,

排除标准

  • Nurses who graduated from Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University
  • Nurses who have worked in the profession for more than one year

结局指标

主要结局

Recognition of Educational Best Practices in Simulation

时间窗: Immediately after the simulation

Education Practice Questionnaire: The instrument has 16 items and includes the following elements: learning (10 items); diverse ways of learning (2 items); high expectations (2 items); and collaboration (2 items). The instrument uses a 5-point Likert scale with categories ranging from 1 (strongly disagree with the statement) to 5 (strongly agree with the statement). Higher scores indicate increased recognition of educational best practices in simulation.

Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Level

时间窗: Immediately after the simulation

The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale: This instrument is a 13 item scale used to measure student satisfaction with the simulation activity (5 items) and self-confidence in learning(8 items). Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale with values ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction and greater levels of self-confidence.

Simulation Design Features Level

时间窗: Immediately after the simulation

Simulation Design Scale: The Simulation Design Scale is a 20-item tool developed. Responses are rated on a 5 point Likert scale with the values ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate increased recognition of design features in simulation.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Acibadem University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Azize Karahan

Lecturer

Acibadem University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验