跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04037852
NCT04037852Unknown不适用

Robotic Versus Conventional or Endoscopic Nipple Sparing Mastectomy in the Management of Breast Cancer- A Prospective Registry Case Control Study

Changhua Christian Hospital13 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 180 人开始时间: 2019年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
180
试验地点
13
主要终点
Morbidity and complications

研究概览

简要总结

This study will prospectively evaluate the surgical outcomes of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) compared with endoscopic assisted NSM or conventional NSM in the management of breast cancer. One-third patients would received R-NSM, another one-third received C-NSM while the other one-third would receive E-NSM.

详细描述

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), which preserved the nipple areolar complex (NAC) and skin flap during mastectomy, was increasingly performed in breast cancer patients due to better cosmetic outcome, higher patient satisfaction, and maintained oncologic safety.

Minimal invasive surgery had become the main stream of operations, and new surgical innovations of NSM, like endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy (E-NSM) or robotic nipple sparing mastectomy (R-NSM), were emerging and applied in the surgical treatment of breast cancer.

E-NSM, which is performed through small axillary and/or peri-areolar incisions, was reported to be associated with small inconspicuous incision and good cosmetic outcome. Conventional E-NSM was performed with two separate incisions over axilla and peri-areolar regions. E-NSM with areolar incision, just like NSM with areolar related incision (NAC ischemia/necrosis rate: range 7%-81.8%), was associated with increased NAC ischemia/necrosis (reported ranged: 9.1-19%). New technique modifications of E-NSM were emerging focusing on single axillary incision NSM, which spare the peri-areolar incision and thereby decrease the compromise of bloody supply from mastectomy skin flap, was reported to have low NAC necrosis rate (0%).

However, the 2-dimensional endoscopic in-line camera produces an inconsistent optical window around the curvature of the breast skin flap, and the internal mobility was limited and the dissection angles were inadequate with traditional endoscopic rigid tips instruments through single access. Due to the limitations of endoscopy instruments and technique difficulty, neither conventional E-NSM nor single access E-NSM was widespread used in breast cancer

R-NSM, which introduce da Vinci surgical platform through a small extra-mammary axillary or lateral chest wound to perform NSM, had been applied in the surgical treatment of early breast cancer or risk reducing mastectomy. R-NSM, which incorporated 3-dimensional (3D) imaging system and flexibility of robotic arm and instruments, was reported to have the potential to overcome the technique difficulty of E-NSM.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

盲法说明

prospective, non-randomized, non-masking, open label, 3 arms

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • A. Indications and selection criteria for nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) in general and conventional nipple sparing mastectomy (C-NSM)
  • NSM will be offered to patients who are suitable for mastectomy but keen to conserve nipple areolar complex (NAC), with or without reconstruction. Patients must not have clinical or radiological involvement of the NAC. Patients with nipple involvement proven via intra-operative frozen section analysis will receive NAC excision and hence a skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) performed instead.
  • B. Indications and selection criteria for robotic nipple sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) or endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy (E-NSM)
  • The general inclusion criteria or pre-requisite for nipple sparing mastectomy apply to R-NSM or E-NSM as well.
  • In addition, R-NSM or E-NSM should only include early stage breast cancer (carcinoma in situ, stage I - IIIA), a tumor size less than 5 cm, no evidence of multiple lymph node metastasis, and no evidence of nipple, skin or chest wall invasion.

排除标准

  • - Contraindications for R-NSM, C-NSM or E-NSM include those with apparent NAC involvement, inflammatory breast cancer, breast cancer with chest wall or skin invasion, locally advanced breast cancer, breast cancer with extensive axillary lymph node metastasis (stage III B or later), and patients with severe co-morbid conditions, such as heart disease, renal failure, liver dysfunction, and poor performance status as assessed by the primary physicians
  • Relative contraindications include women with large (breast cup size larger than E or breast mastectomy weight >600gm) or ptotic breast as the aesthetic outcomes may be suboptimal.

结局指标

主要结局

Morbidity and complications

时间窗: within one month (30 days) post operation

Delayed wound healing, degree of nipple ischemia/necrosis, seroma formation needing repeated aspiration, Blister formation, Skin flap ischemia necrosis, Hematoma formation, Implant loss will be collected and analyzed between different R-NSM, C-NSM and E-NSM groups.

Reconstruction implant volume

时间窗: immediate post operation

Reconstruction implant volume (ml)

Nipple areolar complex ischemia/necrosis grading

时间窗: evaluated in post operative 2 weeks to 3 months post operation

To evaluate the post-operative perfusion and survival of nipple areolar complex (NAC), a grading system was used in current study. The perfusion of NAC was evaluated in 2 weeks to 3 months post operation. The survival of NAC was confirmed at post-operative 3 months. The NAC ischemia/necrosis was divided into 5 different grades, which were: 1. No ischemia/necrosis was observed in NAC (Grade I). 2. Transient ischemia recovered without necrosis (Grade II). 3. Partial ischemia/necrosis, recovered without loss of nipple volume (Grade III). 4. Partial NAC necrosis with partial volume loss of nipple (Grade IV). 5. Total NAC necrosis with all volume loss of nipple (Grade V). NAC ischemia/necrosis was segregated into no NAC necrosis (Grade I-III) and NAC necrosis (Grade IV-V). The ischemia/necrosis of NAC between different R-NSM, C-NSM and E-NSM groups were recorded and compared.

Resection mastectomy weight

时间窗: immediate post operation

Mean mastectomy weight (gm) of patients received different mastectomy operations

Operation time

时间窗: immediate post operation

Overall operation time (minute), including breast cancer operations, lymph node surgery, and breast reconstructions

Pain assessments

时间窗: within post operation two weeks

Pain assessments will also be collected as part of the post-operative parameters. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain assessments will be used in this study (range from 0 to 10 points, 0 indicate no pain, 10 indicate maximal pain ever experienced). VAS for pain per day would be recorded very day and compared.

Surgical margin involvement

时间窗: post operative 2 weeks after pathologic report available

Surgical margin involvement was defined as tumor on the ink. The postoperative adjuvant hormone therapy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were given to patients according to current breast cancer guidelines.

Blood loss during operations

时间窗: immediate post operation

Blood loss (ml) from skin incision to completion of operations

Hospital stay

时间窗: within 2 weeks of operation

Hospital stay (days) during operation period, recorded from admission to day of discharge at the breast cancer operation.

Aesthetic outcome evaluation-Patient reported cosmetic outcome results

时间窗: 1-3 months after the operation when the wound was healed

\- Post-operative aesthetic results will be evaluated by comparing pre-operative and post-operative results. A self-reported questionnaire to evaluate the cosmetic outcome of breast cancer patients with mastectomy following breast reconstruction was conducted 1-3 months after the operation. This questionnaire comprises of 10 questions based on 4 itemized scales, which will be graded as "1, dis-satisfied", "2, fair", "3, satisfied", and "4, very satisfied".

次要结局

  • Cost- analysis of C-NSM versus R-NSM or E-NSM(post operation one month)
  • Disease free survival(5 years post operation)
  • Overall Survival(5 years post operation)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (13)

Loading locations...

相似试验