跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00533988
NCT00533988已完成4 期

Central Venous Catheter-Related Infection: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study

University of Witwatersrand, South Africa0 个研究点目标入组 118 人开始时间: 1996年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
118
主要终点
To determine the influence of antimicrobial impregnated catheters on the incidence of catheter-related infection and whether CVCs can safely be left in place for a period of up to 14 days in critically ill patients

研究概览

简要总结

Intravascular devices are an integral component of modern-day medical practice. Infection is one of the leading complications of intravascular catheters and is associated with an increased mortality, prolonged hospitalization and increased medical costs. Central venous catheters (CVCs) account for an estimated 90% of all catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI). A host of risk factors for CVC-related infections have been documented. This includes most importantly, duration of catheterization. The duration of use of CVCs remains controversial and the length of time such devices can safely be left in situ has not been fully and objectively addressed in the critically ill patient. As a consequence, scheduled replacement remains widely practiced in many Intensive Care Units(ICUs). Over the past few years, antimicrobial impregnated catheters have been introduced in an attempt to limit catheter-related infection (CRI) and increase the time that CVCs can safely be left in place. Recent meta-analyses concluded that antimicrobial impregnated CVCs appear to be effective in reducing CRI. The topic however, remains extremely controversial with different viewpoints appearing in the literature recently.

This was a prospective randomized double-blind study performed in the multidisciplinary ICU at Johannesburg Hospital over a four year period.The study entailed a comparison of standard triple-lumen versus antimicrobial impregnated CVCs on the rate of CRI. The aim was to determine whether the researchers could safely increase the duration of catheter insertion time from the standard practice of seven days to 14 days, to assess the influence of the antimicrobial impregnated catheter on the incidence of CRI, evaluate risk factors and elucidate the epidemiology of CRI.

详细描述

Intravascular devices are an integral component of modern-day medical practice. They are used to administer intravenous fluids, medications, blood products and parenteral nutrition. In addition, they serve as a valuable monitor of the hemodynamic status of critically ill patients.

Infection is one of the leading complications of intravascular catheters and is associated with an increased mortality, prolonged hospitalization and increased medical costs. Central venous catheters(CVCs) account for an estimated 90% of all catheter-related bloodstream infections(CRBSI). A host of risk factors for CVC-related infections have been documented. This includes, most importantly, the duration of catheterization. The duration of use of CVCs remains controversial and the length of time such devices can safely be left in situ has not been fully and objectively addressed in the critically ill patient. As a consequence, scheduled replacement remains widely practiced in many Intensive Care Units(ICUs),the mean time in a recent study in mainland Britain, being 6.5 days.Over the past few years, antimicrobial impregnated catheters have been introduced in an attempt to limit catheter-related infection(CRI) and increase the time that CVCs can safely be left in place.Recent meta-analyses concluded that antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs appear to be effective in reducing CRI.The topic remains extremely controversial with differing viewpoints appearing in the literature.

This was a prospective randomized double-blind study performed in the multidisciplinary ICU at Johannesburg Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa over a four year period. The study included 118 critically ill patients and entailed comparison of a 14-day placement of a standard triple-lumen central venous catheter (ARROW Standard Triple Lumen Catheter, Arrow International Inc., Reading, PA, US) versus an antimicrobial impregnated catheter (chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine)(ARROWgard Triple Lumen Catheter, Arrow International Inc.,Reading, PA, US) on the rate of CRI.

The aim was to:

  1. Determine whether the duration of catheter insertion time could safely be increased from our standard practice of seven days to fourteen days
  2. To assess the influence of the antimicrobial impregnated catheter on the incidence of CRI
  3. To evaluate other previously recorded risk factors for CRI, as well as to
  4. Elucidate the epidemiology of CRI.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • critically ill patients likely to require central venous catheter for at least 14 days
  • age 18+ years
  • white cell count on admission > 4 x 10 to 9/L
  • absence of skin burns
  • no history of allergy to sulfa containing preparations
  • consent obtained
  • catheter to be inserted via internal jugular or subclavian veins

排除标准

  • age < 18 years
  • white blood cell count on admission of less than 4 x 10 to 9/L
  • skin burns
  • history of allergy to sulfa-containing preparations
  • guidewire changes

结局指标

主要结局

To determine the influence of antimicrobial impregnated catheters on the incidence of catheter-related infection and whether CVCs can safely be left in place for a period of up to 14 days in critically ill patients

时间窗: 14 days of catheter placement

次要结局

  • To elucidate the epidemiology and risks of catheter-related infection in a population of critically ill patients(14 day catheter placement)

研究者

发起方
University of Witwatersrand, South Africa
申办方类型
Other

相似试验