跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05074212
NCT05074212已完成不适用

Aesthetic Outcome of Complex Linear Closure vs Second Intention Healing for Cutaneous Surgical Procedures Performed Below the Knee: a Randomized, Blind Control Trial

University of California, Davis2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1 人开始时间: 2022年1月10日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
1
试验地点
2
主要终点
Mean Scar Width

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine whether complex linear closure vs second intention healing for cutaneous wounds below the knee affects esthetic outcomes (primary outcome). As secondary outcome, the study team plans to look at patient quality of life measures and complications. This will be a prospective, 2-arm, randomized, evaluator-blinded clinical trial. One half of the patients will receive repair by complex linear closure and the other half of the patients will undergo second intention healing. Three-months post-surgery, the scar will be evaluated via the patient observer scar assessment scale (POSAS), a validated scar instrument, as well as the trace-to-tape method, an objective outcome measure for linear postoperative scars. In addition, patients will be provided a validated quality of life survey to complete. Any adverse events will also be recorded.

详细描述

When a cutaneous wound is created following Mohs micrographic surgery and standard excisions, a decision is made to either allow the wound to heal by second intention ("leave open") or repair the wound ("close"). The decision may depend on patient characteristics, wound location, wound size or wound characteristics.

When the decision is made to repair the wound, the majority of wounds are reconstructed using two layers of sutures: a deep (subcutaneous) layer and a top (cutaneous) layer.

This study aims to investigate whether complex linear closure versus second intention healing for cutaneous surgical procedures performed below the knee affects wound cosmesis. In other words, the study team would like to determine which of the following yields a more cosmetically appealing scar: below the knee wound that is closed in a linear fashion or below the knee wound that is left open to heal on its own. The study team also plans to look at quality of life measures via validated surveys and complications.

Randomized control trials comparing these two methods appear to be lacking. A randomized trial looked at second intention healing vs primary simple closure following 4mm or 8mm punch biopsies on the arm, back or thigh1. Besides this study, no other information could be found in the literature on randomized trials comparing linear closure vs second intent for cutaneous wounds below the knee. The study team hopes that this study will provide new insight in cutaneous surgery.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Able to give informed consent themselves
  • Patient scheduled for cutaneous surgical procedure below the knee with a lesion excision diameter of at least 1 cm.
  • Willing to return for follow up visit

排除标准

  • Incarceration
  • Under 18 years of age
  • Pregnant Women

研究组 & 干预措施

Complex Linear Closure

Experimental

The study participant will receive two layers of sutures to close the wound.

干预措施: Factorial Assignment (Other)

Second Intention Healing

Experimental

The study participant will not have any sutures placed.

干预措施: Factorial Assignment (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Mean Scar Width

时间窗: 3-12 months

Mean scar width will be measured using the trace-to-tape method.

POSAS

时间窗: 3-12 months

The primary outcome is the sum of the average components of the Observer portion of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). The observer scale of the POSAS consists of six items (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability and surface area). All items are scored on a scale ranging from 1 ('like normal skin') to 10 ('worst scar imaginable'). The sum of the six items results in a total score of the POSAS observer scale. Categories boxes are added for each item. Furthermore, an overall opinion is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 10.

次要结局

  • Occurrence of Complications(3-12 months)
  • Quality of Life Measures (DLQI)(3-12 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验