跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04995601
NCT04995601已完成不适用

Wearable Technology to Reduce Risk of DVT and Increase Patient Compliance

Recovery Force LLC2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 136 人开始时间: 2022年4月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
136
试验地点
2
主要终点
Compliance to Prescribed Use

研究概览

简要总结

The primary purpose of this study is to conduct a multi-site clinical trial of the Recovery Force Movement and Compressions (RF MAC) System. The study is a randomized comparative study of DVT prophylaxis using either standard IPC (Group 1) or the RF MAC system (Group 2) in 300 patients after TJR surgery at two study sites: Tufts Medical Center (Boston, Massachusetts) and Eskenazi Hospital (Indianapolis, Indiana). This study is funded by a Phase II SBIR awarded to Recovery Force from the National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (R44-HL132624-02).

详细描述

DVT is the most feared complication of total joint replacement (TJR), with more than 300,000 total hip and 700,000 total knee replacements performed annually in the U.S. Current recommendations for postoperative DVT prophylaxis after TJR include anti-coagulant medications and/or intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) of the lower limb for a minimum of 10-14 days. Most current IPC devices are non-mobile, making early postoperative mobility, which is especially important in TJR patients, cumbersome and time-consuming. Upon hospital discharge, most patients go home on pharmacologic DVT prophylaxis. Even when at-home external compression therapy is prescribed (IPC or compression stockings), data suggests compliance rates as low as 10-50%.

Recovery Force (RF) has produced the next generation of mechanical DVT prophylaxis, with a mobile device absent of tubes and pumps, stays in place during ambulation, is lightweight and comfortable for continuous wear, and is designed to improve compliance with recommended use. The hypothesis for Phase II is that IPC using the RF1400 will result in improved compliance, support early mobility and result in significantly higher functional mobility after TJR as compared to standard of care.

The research team will conduct a randomized comparative study of DVT prophylaxis using either standard IPC (Group 1) or the RF1400 (Group 2) in 300 patients after TJR surgery. Dr. Karen Giuliano of the University of Massachusetts Amherst will serve as the overall PI for efforts associated with the study sites. This study will include an inpatient phase and an outpatient phase with patients at two clinical sites: Tufts Medical Center and Indiana University School of Medicine, with each site enrolling 150 patients (75 control/75 experimental).

The overall goal of Phase II is to demonstrate that compliance with perscribed use, comfort, and ease-of-use is significantly higher with the RF1400 than with DVT prophylaxis using either standard IPC (in-hospital) or standard-of-care (at-home) in preparation for full commercialization in the TJR market during Phase III. The DVT therapy market is expected to hit $3.8B by 2021, and the US accounts for over 50% of the global market. With the current risk of bleeding from anticoagulant DVT prophylaxis at 5.6%, the commercial impact of this research is that improved patient compliance with the RF1400 DVT prophylaxis will improve postoperative mobility and provide an effective alternative to anticoagulation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
40 Years 至 85 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • adult patients (age 40-85)
  • first elective total hip replacement (THR) or first or second (opposite knee) elective total knee replacement (TKA
  • speak English
  • expected to have a hospital stay of two days or less
  • discharge to home from hospital (not a rehabilitation facility)
  • must be able to perform self-care
  • BMI between 18 and 39
  • calf circumference between 11 and 24.5 inches

排除标准

  • partial joint replacement, TJR revisions, emergency surgeries
  • calf deformities that would not allow proper fit for external compression device
  • non-ambulatory
  • clinically malnourished or frail/deconditioned
  • vulnerable patients (pregnant women, prisoners, homeless and cognitively impaired)
  • do not speak English

结局指标

主要结局

Compliance to Prescribed Use

时间窗: day 1 postoperative joint replacement

Compare patient compliance (percentage of prescribed use/24hr) between the standard of care sequential compression device and the Recovery Force Mobility and Compression (MAC) system in a group of total joint replacement patients.

Patient-reported Comfort

时间窗: at the end of 14-day data collection period

Compare patient-reported comfort (patient reported outcomes in the hospital-standard of care vs RF MAC-for overall comfort, where higher score is better device performance (5-pt Likert Scale; 1=Strongly disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 4=Agree, 5=Strongly Agree) between the standard of care sequential compression device and the Recovery Force Mobility and Compression (MAC) system in a group of total joint replacement patients.

Patient-reported Ease-of-use

时间窗: at the end of 14-day data collection period

Compare patient-reported ease-of-use (using the System Usability Scale, with a range of 0-21, where higher score =higher ease of use) between the standard of care sequential compression device and the Recovery Force Mobility and Compression (MAC) system in a group of total joint replacement patients.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验