跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05209412
NCT05209412进行中(未招募)不适用

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions: an Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial

Xijing Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 370 人开始时间: 2022年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
发起方
入组人数
370
试验地点
1
主要终点
Coronary fraction flow reserve (FFR) value

研究概览

简要总结

Coronary restenosis has been one of the main reasons affecting the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). With drug-eluting stents (DES), which elutes an antiproliferative drug to the vessel wall and reduces the restenosis rate; however, the incidence of restenosis is still about 10%. The late stent thrombosis and restenosis, with a hazard of nearly 2% per year after implantation, remained a concern and motivated the development of drug-coated balloons (DCB).

DCB angioplasty has the following advantages compared with DES implantation: Firstly, the drug in DCB is uniformly distributed and released; whereas the drug release of DES via stent platform is uneven -85% of the vascular wall is not covered by the stent strut. Secondly, there is no alloy in the vessel after DCB angioplasty, while the coronary stent platform and polymer might cause temporal or persistent inflammatory response leading to intimal hyperplasia. Finally, there is no metal cage restraining vessel motion after DCB, the physiological function of coronary arteries would be maintained.

Studies with the strategy of DCB angioplasty with bailout stenting have demonstrated safety and efficacy for the small-vessel disease. The application of DCB in large vessels with de novo lesions is still to be investigated. The DEBUT study showed that in high bleeding risk patients aimed using only 1-month DAPT, DCB was superior to BMS in terms of MACE [MACE (cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction or revascularization of ischemia-reperfusion target lesions)] at 9-month follow-up.

However, there is still a lack of evidence comparing the DCB versus DES in large vessels with de novo lesions. The current study aims to investigate if in patients undergoing PCI for de novo stenoses in large vessels, DCB is non-inferior to DES.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 18y ≤ age ≤ 80y;
  • De-novo coronary artery lesions with an indication for PCI;
  • Target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 70% (visual) or ≥ 50% (visual) with evidence of ischemia;
  • Target lesion reference vessel diameter (2.5mm-4.0 mm), Length of a single target lesion ≤ 35mm; Total treated lesion length ≤ 60 mm;
  • Vessels treated ≤ 2; only one DCB/DES is allowed for each target vessel;
  • ≤ 2 non-target lesions (non-TL) are allowed, and can not be in the same vessel as the target lesion (randomization should be implemented only after the successful treatment of all non-TL);
  • Patients who are able to complete the follow-up and compliant to the prescribed medication.

排除标准

  • Myocardial infarction (< 7 days);
  • Heavy thrombotic burden in target vessel;
  • eGFR < 30ml/min or hemodialysis patients;
  • Other cardiovascular and cerebrovascular procedures planned within 12 months after index PCI;
  • Patients with contraindications to antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants or bleeding tendency, history of active peptic ulcer, and stroke within 6 months;
  • Life expectancy of less than 1 years;
  • Patient is a woman who is pregnant or nursing;
  • Known allergic to medications such as Aspirin, Heparin, antiplatelet drugs, paclitaxel, or contrast; patients with systemic lupus erythematosus or other systemic immune diseases;
  • Chronic total occlusion lesion;
  • Unprotected left main disease;
  • Bifurcation lesion requiring 2 stents;
  • Ostial lesions, distance from left main ≤ 2mm;
  • Severe calcification or distortion;
  • Arterial, venous or prosthetic grafts;
  • In-stent stenosis requiring revascularization (defined as stenosis≥50% by visual or positive functional assessments in any vessel);
  • Myocardial bridging located at target lesions;
  • Currently participating in another trial and not yet at its primary endpoint;
  • Participants deemed unsuitable to be enrolled by investigators for unable to comply with protocol or other reasons.

研究组 & 干预措施

Drug-coated balloon

Experimental

Lepu Paclitaxel coated balloon will be used

干预措施: Lepu Paclitaxel coated balloon (Device)

Drug-coated balloon

Experimental

Lepu Paclitaxel coated balloon will be used

干预措施: Aspirin (Drug)

Drug-coated balloon

Experimental

Lepu Paclitaxel coated balloon will be used

干预措施: Ticagrelor (Drug)

Drug-coated balloon

Experimental

Lepu Paclitaxel coated balloon will be used

干预措施: Clopidogrel (Drug)

Drug-eluting stent

Active Comparator

Resolute Integrity Zotarolimus eluting stents will be used

干预措施: Resolute Integrity Zotarolimus eluting stents (Device)

Drug-eluting stent

Active Comparator

Resolute Integrity Zotarolimus eluting stents will be used

干预措施: Aspirin (Drug)

Drug-eluting stent

Active Comparator

Resolute Integrity Zotarolimus eluting stents will be used

干预措施: Ticagrelor (Drug)

Drug-eluting stent

Active Comparator

Resolute Integrity Zotarolimus eluting stents will be used

干预措施: Clopidogrel (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Coronary fraction flow reserve (FFR) value

时间窗: 12 months

次要结局

  • In segment Late lumen loss (LLL)(12 months)

研究者

发起方
Xijing Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

LingTao

Professor in Cardiology, Director of the department of Cardiology

Xijing Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验