NCT07761884尚未招募不适用
Early Implementation of Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: a Randomized, Multicenter, Prospective, Open-label, Pragmatic Study.
适应症
干预措施
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 40
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To evaluate bowel function in terms of at least a 50% improvement in episodes of urgency and/or incontinence due to LARS, as measured by a two-week bowel diary, following early NMS implantation compared with personalized conservative treatment.
研究概览
简要总结
A randomized, prospective, multicenter, open-label, pragmatic pilot study of patients with Low Anterior Resection Syndrome treated early (<120 days after discharge following intestinal bypass reconstruction) with sacral nerve root neuromodulation, compared with another group receiving personalized conservative treatment as performed in routine clinical practice.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Adult patients (18 years of age or older) who are capable of signing the appropriate informed consent form.
- •Patients who have undergone an anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer, with an anastomosis, whether or not they have received neoadjuvant therapy, and who have bowel function, either via a direct anastomosis or following reconstruction of a lateral ileostomy.
- •Patients who experience more than 6 episodes of urgency and/or incontinence in the following two weeks after the screening visit, as recorded in a daily bowel diary.
- •Patients with a LARS score >21 points (major or minor LARS).
- •Patients who report at least one symptom and one consequence as defined by the international definition.
排除标准
- •Metastatic disease at the time of surgery.
- •Need for adjuvant chemotherapy at the time of assessment.
- •Active chemotherapy.
- •Patients with an ileostomy.
- •Intellectual or language-related difficulty in answering the questionnaires.
- •Refusal to participate in the study or failure to commit to follow-up visits.
- •Patients with contraindications for sacral neuromodulation implantation (those with pacemakers, active infections, or allergies to prosthetic materials).
- •Patients with active inflammatory bowel disease at the time of surgery.
- •Patients who have undergone other intestinal resections in addition to rectal resection.
研究组 & 干预措施
Sacral neuromodulation
Experimental
干预措施: Sacral neuromodulation (Device)
Personalized conservative treatment
No Intervention
结局指标
主要结局
To evaluate bowel function in terms of at least a 50% improvement in episodes of urgency and/or incontinence due to LARS, as measured by a two-week bowel diary, following early NMS implantation compared with personalized conservative treatment.
时间窗: 6 months
次要结局
- Assess changes in symptoms and outcomes as defined by the International Consensus Definition of LARS.(6 months)
- Assess changes in the fragmentation component of the syndrome as recorded in the patient's daily bowel movement diary.(6 months)
- Assess changes in stool consistency as recorded in the patient's daily bowel movement diary.(6 months)
- Assess changes in soiling episodes as recorded in the patient's daily bowel movement diary.(6 months)
- Assess changes in bowel function in both groups using patient's daily bowel function and quality-of-life scales: the LARS score (Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score), which divides patients in three groups: 0-20 No LARS; 21-29: Mild LARS; 30-42: Severe(6 months)
- Assess changes in bowel function in both groups using patient's daily bowel function and quality-of-life scales: the Vaizey score, which measures the presence and severity of incontinence assigning a score from 0 (meaning complete continence) to 24 (mean(5 years)
- Assess changes in bowel function in both groups using patient's daily bowel function and quality-of-life scales: ad hoc scale. The minimum value for the scale is 0 (meaning the worst health the patient can imagine) and the maximum value is 100 (meaning t(6 months)
- Analyze subjective clinical improvement as assessed by patients using PGI-I scale (Patient Global Impression of Improvement). It consists of the answer to a question choosing one of 7 options from "1=Much better" to "7=Much worst".(6 months)
- Examine changes in urinary and sexual function, analyzed by gender and specific scale. For male, the IIEF-5 (Índice Internacional De Función Erectil) will be used, which assesses erectile dysfunction from 5 (severe) to 25 (healthy). For female, The Rec(6 months)
研究者
研究点 (1)
Loading locations...
相似试验
尚未招募
4 期
Comparative Assessment of Inclisiran on Top of Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone for LDL-C Evaluation in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in Saudi ArabiaAcute Coronary SyndromeNCT07684469Novartis Pharmaceuticals300
尚未招募
1 期
Evaluation of T320, an Anti-Tissue Factor Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients With Advanced Solid TumorsNCT07434609Nanolattix Biotechnology Co., Ltd.150
招募中
2 期
A clinical study to understand if the Smart Dre-M wound dressing is safe and helps in healing wounds caused by any injury, diabetes, or burns.CTRI/2025/10/096240Neurop Pharma Products Pvt Ltd.25
招募中
3 期
Efficacy and safety study of Bedaquiline in MB Leprosy.CTRI/2025/02/079888Janssen Pharmaceutica NV262
进行中（未招募）
1 期
Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Dupilumab Coformulated With Berahyaluronidase Alfa and Dupilumab Without Berahyaluronidase Alfa in Healthy ParticipantsHealthy VolunteersNCT07646548Sanofi40