跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05053516
NCT05053516Unknown不适用

Development and Effectiveness Evaluation of the Standardized Training Program for Social Workers for Drug Treatment Based on Industry Needs

Shanghai Mental Health Center0 个研究点目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2021年11月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
100
主要终点
Comprehensive competency assessment

研究概览

简要总结

Now, there are few researches on the ability of social workers who work with drug addicts / drug users in China, and the sample size is small and the content is not deep enough.The existing studies suggest that the professional knowledge and ability of social workers who work with drug addicts / drug users are insufficient and the vocational training is not standardized. On the other hand, the ability of social workers who work with drug addicts / drug users workers is related to the effectiveness of anti-drug in communities. So the large sample survey will help to understand the current working status and working ability of social workers who work with drug addicts / drug users in China.The development of the standardized training programs for social workers who work with drug addicts / drug users can improve the professional knowledge and ability of anti-drug social workers, so as to better help community drug rehabilitation personnel and finally reduce the relapse rate.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • aged between 20 and 65;no gender limitation;those who agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent.

排除标准

  • inability to use online training.

结局指标

主要结局

Comprehensive competency assessment

时间窗: 3 months

Comprehensive competency assessment Focus interview: It is planned to recruit 8 anti-drug social workers for focus interviews.Adopt the minimum sample principle, and stop recruiting when new objects cannot provide new information.Outline of interviews: Is the time, content of the training reasonable? Whether the training has achieved the desired effect? If not, what are the shortcomings?

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验