跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06874829
NCT06874829进行中(未招募)不适用

Post-activation Performance Enhancement in Multi- Vs Single-Joint Movements: a Comparative Study of BFR and EMS in Male Volleyball Athletes

Karabuk University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 15 人开始时间: 2025年2月10日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
发起方
入组人数
15
试验地点
1
主要终点
Service speed

研究概览

简要总结

Investigators used a randomized controlled crossover design to compare the effect of blood flow restriction (BFR) and electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) protocols on post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) in multi-joint versus single-joint exercises. Participants took part in six test sessions 72 hours apart. In the BFR group, 50% of the arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) was used. In the EMS group, a 75 Hz current was applied. In the Low Resistance exercise group, only exercise was performed without any condition. Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions.

详细描述

Participants took part in six test sessions 72 hours apart. All tests were performed between 2 and 4 pm to reduce the influence of circadian rhythms or fatigue on performance. Anthropometric measurements, 1 RM test, and grip strength and serving speed tests were determined before the practice session on the first day as a control condition. On the other six experimental days, players were randomly assigned to protocols (BFR, EMS, and LOW-LOAD) using software (http://www.randomizer.org). In the BFR group, 50% of the arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) was used. In the EMS group, a 75 Hz current was applied. In the Low Resistance exercise group, only exercise was performed without any condition. Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions. In all protocols, participants performed a standardized warm-up protocol consisting of a 5-minute run at 9 km/h on a treadmill and a general warm-up consisting of 3 minutes of whole-body light stretching exercises. Following the warm-up and pre-exercise protocols, grip strength and service speed tests were performed with rest periods.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Participants were strictly separated and think their intervention is the main intervention. The same is true for care providers. Outcome assessors were unaware of participant group status and were not allowed to ask correspondingly.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 30 Years(Adult)
性别
Male
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Being healthy
  • •Male volleyball athletes
  • •Willing to maintain the intervention for all sessions

排除标准

  • •Being under 18 years old
  • •Having a chronic disease
  • •Contraindication for Electromyostimulation (EMS)
  • •Contraindication for Blood Flow Restriction (BFR)
  • •Contraindications for exercise

研究组 & 干预措施

Blood flow restriction

Active Comparator

In the BFR group, 50% of the arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) was used.Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions.

干预措施: Blood Flow Restriction (Other)

Electrical muscle stimulation

Active Comparator

In the EMS group, a 75 Hz current was applied. Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions.

干预措施: Electrical Muscle Stimulation (Other)

Low Load Resistance Exercise

Active Comparator

In the Low Resistance Exercise group, only exercise was performed without any condition (BFR or EMS. Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions.

干预措施: Low-Load Resistance Exercise (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Service speed

时间窗: From baseline to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Service speed will assess by standard radar apparatus (Net Playz Smart Pro Speed Radar, USA) and will record in km/h.

Hand Grip strength

时间窗: From baseline to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Hand grip strength will assess by hand grip dynamometer (Takei 5,101, Tokyo, Japan) and will record in kg.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Karabuk University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Neslihan AKÇAY

Assoc. Prof. Dr.

Karabuk University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验