Post-activation Performance Enhancement in Multi- Vs Single-Joint Movements: a Comparative Study of BFR and EMS in Male Volleyball Athletes
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中(未招募)
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 15
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Service speed
研究概览
简要总结
Investigators used a randomized controlled crossover design to compare the effect of blood flow restriction (BFR) and electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) protocols on post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) in multi-joint versus single-joint exercises. Participants took part in six test sessions 72 hours apart. In the BFR group, 50% of the arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) was used. In the EMS group, a 75 Hz current was applied. In the Low Resistance exercise group, only exercise was performed without any condition. Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions.
详细描述
Participants took part in six test sessions 72 hours apart. All tests were performed between 2 and 4 pm to reduce the influence of circadian rhythms or fatigue on performance. Anthropometric measurements, 1 RM test, and grip strength and serving speed tests were determined before the practice session on the first day as a control condition. On the other six experimental days, players were randomly assigned to protocols (BFR, EMS, and LOW-LOAD) using software (http://www.randomizer.org). In the BFR group, 50% of the arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) was used. In the EMS group, a 75 Hz current was applied. In the Low Resistance exercise group, only exercise was performed without any condition. Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions. In all protocols, participants performed a standardized warm-up protocol consisting of a 5-minute run at 9 km/h on a treadmill and a general warm-up consisting of 3 minutes of whole-body light stretching exercises. Following the warm-up and pre-exercise protocols, grip strength and service speed tests were performed with rest periods.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
Participants were strictly separated and think their intervention is the main intervention. The same is true for care providers. Outcome assessors were unaware of participant group status and were not allowed to ask correspondingly.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 30 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- Male
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Being healthy
- •Male volleyball athletes
- •Willing to maintain the intervention for all sessions
排除标准
- •Being under 18 years old
- •Having a chronic disease
- •Contraindication for Electromyostimulation (EMS)
- •Contraindication for Blood Flow Restriction (BFR)
- •Contraindications for exercise
研究组 & 干预措施
Blood flow restriction
In the BFR group, 50% of the arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) was used.Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions.
干预措施: Blood Flow Restriction (Other)
Electrical muscle stimulation
In the EMS group, a 75 Hz current was applied. Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions.
干预措施: Electrical Muscle Stimulation (Other)
Low Load Resistance Exercise
In the Low Resistance Exercise group, only exercise was performed without any condition (BFR or EMS. Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions.
干预措施: Low-Load Resistance Exercise (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Service speed
时间窗: From baseline to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Service speed will assess by standard radar apparatus (Net Playz Smart Pro Speed Radar, USA) and will record in km/h.
Hand Grip strength
时间窗: From baseline to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Hand grip strength will assess by hand grip dynamometer (Takei 5,101, Tokyo, Japan) and will record in kg.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Neslihan AKÇAY
Assoc. Prof. Dr.
Karabuk University
