跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00962897
NCT00962897已完成不适用

A Retrospective Review of Randomized Comparison of Prosthetic Femoropopliteal Bypass Versus Viabahn Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Symptomatic Femoral Artery Occlusion With Four Years Followup

Texas Vascular Associates1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2003年9月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
Primary artery/graft patency

研究概览

简要总结

A retrospective review with four year followup on patients that had previously been enrolled in a study to evaluate blockages in the lower legs. The study looked at patients that had undergone a bypass of the leg from the groin to the knee area with an incision in each area using general anesthesia. These patients were compared to others who had undergone treatment with balloon dilatation and stents in the arteries in the thighs with only numbing medicine. The study was completed two years ago and was initially designed to look at outcomes at 24 months. Now the investigators are trying to go back and look at outcomes of these patients' treatment at 4 years by simply reviewing their records.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Symptomatic lower extremity ischemia patients treated by femoral-popliteal bypass or percutaneous covered stent graft in previous prospective study

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Primary artery/graft patency

时间窗: 48 months

次要结局

  • Improvement of lower extremity ischemic symptoms(48 months)
  • Secondary artery/graft patency(48 months)
  • Limb salvage(48 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验