Effects of Cervical Distraction Versus Cervical Traction Techniques on Pain, Range of Motion and Function in Patients With Upper Cervical Pain
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 42
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- NDI
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of cervical distraction versus cervical traction techniques on pain, range of motion and function in patients with upper cervical pain. This study will be randomized clinical trial and 42 patients according to inclusion criteria will be included in the study. They will be allocated into 2 groups by non-probability purposive sampling technique. Group A will receive cervical distraction technique with conventional physical therapy while Group B will receive cervical traction technique with conventional therapy. Outcome measures; Neck Disability Index, goniometry and Numeric Pain Rating Scale will measure neck function and neck pain intensity. Both groups will receive 5 sessions per week for 4 weeks and measurements will be taken at the baseline and at the end of 4th week. Data will be analyzed by SPSS version 25
详细描述
The term collectively used for musculoskeletal conditions originating from cervical area is known as neck pain. According to the Global burden of disease (2010) study, neck pain is the fourth agent which is the reason behind chronic disability. The incidence of cervical pain in the adult population aged 15 to 74 years is 5.92% to 38.7% and it is more prevalent in women than men. The best predictor of future neck pain is the presence of an episode of neck pain in the past. Cervical rotation deficits are noted mostly in upper cervical spine issues as in atlantoaxial joint pathology.
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of cervical distraction versus cervical traction techniques on pain, range of motion and function in patients with upper cervical pain. This study will be a randomized clinical trial and 42 patients according to inclusion criteria will be included in the study. They will be allocated into 2 groups by non-probability purposive sampling technique. Group A will receive the cervical distraction technique with conventional physical therapy while Group B will receive the cervical traction technique with conventional therapy. Outcome measures; Neck Disability Index, goniometry and Numeric Pain Rating Scale will measure neck function and neck pain intensity. Both groups will receive 5 sessions per week for 4 weeks and measurements will be taken at the baseline and at the end of 4th week. Data will be analyzed by SPSS version 25.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 45 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Minimum 3 months chronicity of upper cervical pain
- •Positive flexion-rotation test (asymmetry of >10◦ between sides or less than 32◦ in any direction)
- •hypomobility in one or more segments of C0-1, C1-2, or C2-3
排除标准
- •Congenital abnormalities (Cervical torticollis)
- •Past surgical history of cervical spine
- •Any history of neck trauma
- •Already undergone physiotherapy treatment
结局指标
主要结局
NDI
时间窗: 4th Week
The NDI has become a standard instrument for measuring self-rated disability due to neck pain. Each of the 10 items scores from 0 to 5. The maximum score is 50.
NPRS
时间窗: 4th week
The NPRS is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing no pain to 10 representing the worst imaginable pain
Goniometric measurement
时间窗: 4th Week
The science of measuring the joint ranges in each plane of the joint is called goniometry. Goniometer is a device that measures an angle or permits the rotation of an object to a definite position. Neck flexion, extension, side bending and rotation will be assessed through it
次要结局
未报告次要终点