跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06692010
NCT06692010尚未招募4 期

Comparison Between Clavipectoral Fascia Block & Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block As Regard Adequacy of Anesthesia in Clavicle Surgeries

Assiut University0 个研究点目标入组 42 人开始时间: 2024年12月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
42
主要终点
Pain Scores

研究概览

简要总结

A newer technique called clavipectoral fascial plane block (CPB), introduced by Valdés-Vilches in 2017, involves injecting local anesthetic under ultrasound guidance between the clavipectoral fascia and periosteum at the injury site. This method offers a promising alternative for effective regional anesthesia in clavicular fracture surgeries. this study is aim to Comparison Between Use of Ultrasound guided Clavipectroal fascia block ( CPB ) & interscalene brachial plexus block ( ISBP ) As Regard Adeqacy of Anesthesia in clavicle Fracture

详细描述

Clavicle fractures represent 2.6% of all fractures and are commonly seen in emergency and surgical settings, particularly among young men due to sports or traffic incidents, predominantly affecting the mid-clavicle. Surgical intervention often yields better functional outcomes compared to conservative treatment. While general anesthesia is an option, it carries risks such as nausea, vomiting, and increased costs for patients. In contrast, regional anesthesia can effectively manage pain while minimizing complications associated with general anesthesia.

The supraclavicular nerve innervates the skin above the clavicle, but the sensory innervation of the clavicle itself remains debated. A combination of superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) and interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBP) is frequently employed during clavicle fracture surgeries. The brachial plexus includes nerves from C5-8 and T1, while the cervical plexus comprises branches from both deep and superficial cervical structures. Although this combination can effectively address pain management during surgery, ISBP may lead to complications like diaphragmatic paralysis due to phrenic nerve involvement.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • . Patients who have isolated clavicle surgery. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II

排除标准

  • 1.Patient with Major Trauma Insult " Brain \ chest \ Abdomen " 2.History of bleeding diathesis 3.Patients receiving anticoagulant treatment, 4.Patients known local anesthetics and opioid allergy, 5.Infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture, 6.Pregnant or lactating females, 7.Patients who do not accept the procedure

研究组 & 干预措施

Group CPB

Experimental

Clavipectoral fascia plane block group

干预措施: Bupivacaine with Dexamethasone Solution (Drug)

Group ISBP & SCPB

Experimental

Interscalene brachial plexus block & superficial cervical plexus block group

干预措施: Bupivacaine with Dexamethasone Solution (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Pain Scores

时间窗: 24 hours

Postoperative pain level will be assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) from (0 that's no pain to 10 that's unbearable pain) at specific time points (1, 6, 12, 24 hours post-surgery)

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Sara Gamal Ibrahem Othman

Resident doctor at Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management department

Assiut University

相似试验