跳至主要内容
临床试验/EUCTR2015-004870-14-Outside-EU/EEA
EUCTR2015-004870-14-Outside-EU/EEA进行中(未招募)1 期

A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group study to determine the efficacy and safety of nebulized fluticasone propionate 1mg twice daily compared with oral prednisone administered for 7 days to Chinese pediatric and adolescent subjects (aged 4 to 16 years) with an acute exacerbation of asthma

GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development Ltd0 个研究点目标入组 251 人开始时间: 2016年8月3日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
1 期
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
251

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product

入排标准

性别
All

入选标准

  • - Chinese male and female pediatric or adolescent subjects aged 4 to 16 years, inclusive
  • - Subjects have an established diagnosis of asthma
  • - The definition of asthma. According to Chinese Guideline for the diagnosis and optimal management of asthma in children [Respiratory branch of pediatric society,Chinese Medical. Association. 2008, revised version], the subjects can be diagnosed when meeting the criteria. The diagnosis criteria is listed in the protocol.
  • - The severity of an acute exacerbation of asthma is defined as PEF of 50% to 75% predicted via a peak flow meter, with a clinical scoring index of =2. The clinical scoring index represents the sum of the score for each of four signs: respiratory rate (0=low to 3=high, dependent on age), wheezing (0=none to 3=severe), inspiration/expiration ratio (0=2:1 to 3=1:3), and accessory muscle (0=none to 3=marked use).
  • - Subjects can properly use a mini-wright peak flow meter, nebulizer and MDI with/without a spacer, and accurately complete a diary card with parental assistance, if required.
  • - Subjects’ parents/guardians are willing to give written informed consent.
  • Are the trial subjects under 18? yes
  • Number of subjects for this age range: 251
  • F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) no
  • F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range
  • F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no
  • F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

排除标准

  • - Severe respiratory dysfunction.
  • - History of mechanical ventilation due to respiratory failure.
  • - Admission to hospital due to respiratory disease within the previous 2 weeks, including asthmatic exacerbations.
  • - Clinical or lab evidence of a serious, uncontrolled systemic disease or presence of any disease likely to interfere with the objectives of this study, such as pulmonary cystic fibrosis and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
  • - Known or suspected hypersensitivity to glucocorticosteroids or ß2 agonists.
  • - Clinical visual evidence of oral candidiasis at Visit1.
  • - Use of the medications below in Table 1 according to the following defined time intervals prior to presentation. The list is provided in the protocol.

研究者

相似试验

进行中(未招募)
不适用
A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ramelteon compared to placebo with zopiclone as a reference arm in adults with chronic insomniachronic insomniaMedDRA version: 8Level: LLTClassification code 10053851
EUCTR2004-004350-91-ATTakeda Global R&D Centre (Europe)275
进行中(未招募)
1 期
A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ramelteon compared to placebo with zopiclone as a reference arm in adults with chronic insomnia
EUCTR2004-004350-91-DETakeda Global R&D Centre (Europe)275
进行中(未招募)
1 期
A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ramelteon compared to placebo with zopiclone as a reference arm in adults with chronic insomniachronic insomniaMedDRA version: 8 Level: LLT Classification code 10053851
EUCTR2004-004350-91-GBTakeda Europe R&D Centre Ltd210
进行中(未招募)
不适用
A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ramelteon compared to placebo with zopiclone as a reference arm in adults with chronic insomniachronic insomniaMedDRA version: 8Level: LLTClassification code 10053851
EUCTR2004-004350-91-FITakeda Global R&D Centre (Europe)275
进行中(未招募)
不适用
A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ramelteon compared to placebo with zopiclone as a reference arm in adults with chronic insomnia - NDchronic insomniaMedDRA version: 6.1Level: PTClassification code 10022437
EUCTR2004-004350-91-ITTAKEDA EUROPE RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CENTRE LTD210
Comparison of safety and efficacy of asthma... | 临床试验