跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00604019
NCT00604019已完成3 期

Dopamine Versus Norepinephrine for the Treatment of Vasopressor Dependent Septic Shock

Rush University Medical Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 252 人开始时间: 2003年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
252
试验地点
1
主要终点
Efficacy and Safety of Dopamine Versus Norepinephrine in Septic Shock

研究概览

简要总结

We are performing a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of dopamine versus norepinephrine for septic shock. The trial will enroll patients with suspected or documented site of infection and having 2 out of the three SIRS criteria. Patients will also be receiving standard of care, early-goal directed therapy including but not limited to fluid resuscitation, appropriate and early antibiotics, source control and evaluation for drotrecogin alpha where deemed appropriate, while being supported for septic shock.

详细描述

Research Question/Hypothesis: The initial selection of the vasopressor norepinephrine in comparison to dopamine will result in a decrease in mortality for patients in septic shock.

Study Design/Source Population:

This trial is a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label comparison of dopamine versus norepinephrine as initial vasopressor for patients presenting with septic shock. The study takes place at Rush University Medical Center, a 600 bed facility. Patients are transferred to our medical intensive care unit from the emergency room (ER), general medical floors, and from outside hospitals. Patients were eligible if they were greater than 18 years of age, and presented with a diagnosis of SIRS plus a suspected or documented source of infection. Patients were not eligible if they were found to have hypovolemic and/or hemorrhagic etiologies of their vasodilatory shock or another etiology of their SIRS.

Patients in the medical intensive care unit presenting with septic shock were randomized to receive either dopamine or norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressors for septic shock. Randomization was based upon whether the patient presented on an odd or even day of the week. For example, if the patient had presented on the third then they would be randomized to dopamine and if they had presented to the ICU on the fourth then they would be randomized to the norepinephrine treatment arm. The study investigators accept that the randomization scheme is not truly randomized, however a patient presenting with sepsis is not dependent on the day of the week. For example, the timeline for a patient to present with sepsis is unpredictable and the therapy for septic shock is started immediately upon their diagnosis, therefore the selection of a vasoactive agent (norepinephrine or dopamine) is really determined by the date of the patient's presentation, rather than the investigator.

All patients were treated according to recommendations by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (early-goal directed therapy including fluid resuscitation, early and appropriate antimicrobial therapy, strict glycemic control, and consideration of steroid replacement for patients with relative adrenal insufficiency). Patients presenting with hemodynamic instability are first treated with initial fluid resuscitation which encompasses either 500ml to 1000ml of crystalloid or 300ml to 500ml of colloid, depending on a clinician's preference. The administration and titration of vasopressors was directed to achieve a mean arterial pressure ≥ 60 mmHg or a systolic pressure ≥ 90 mmHg. If the predetermined maximum dose was reached for the initial vasopressor, then an addition of vasopressin at a continuous dose of 0.04 units/min was initiated. Patients who still required hemodynamic support were then started on an infusion of phenylephrine.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients are transferred to our medical intensive care unit from the emergency room (ER), general medical floors, and from outside hospitals.
  • Patients were eligible if they were greater than 18 years of age
  • Presented with a diagnosis of SIRS plus a suspected or documented source of infection.

排除标准

  • Patients were not eligible if they were found to have hypovolemic and/or hemorrhagic etiologies of their vasodilatory shock or another etiology of their SIRS.

研究组 & 干预措施

Dopamine

Active Comparator

Patients that get Dopamine as an infusion for hypotension

干预措施: Dopamine (Drug)

Norepinephrine

Active Comparator

Patients that get norepinephrine as an infusion for hypotension

干预措施: Norepinephrine (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Efficacy and Safety of Dopamine Versus Norepinephrine in Septic Shock

时间窗: 28 days

We measured 28 day all-cause mortality in randomized patients with septic shock managed with a vasopressor protocol containing either dopamine versus norepinephrine.

次要结局

  • Safety, Arrythmia - Yes or no for Each Group(28 days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验