跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04153370
NCT04153370已完成不适用

Comparison of Airtraq, Glidescope and C-mac in Infants

Kocaeli University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2019年11月5日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
intubation time

研究概览

简要总结

difficult intubation is high in the 0-1 year period. Video laryngoscopes improved intubation success rate when compared to direct laryngoscopy.

We compared the Airtraq, Glidescope, and c-mac video laryngoscopes during intubation of <1 year old children undergoing neurosurgery.

详细描述

Aim: difficult intubation is high in the 0-1 year period. Video laryngoscopes improved intubation success rate when compared to direct laryngoscopy.

Methods: We enroll 20 patients age under 1 year old undergoing neurosurgery in this prospective randomized study. We compared the Airtraq, Glidescope, and c-mac video laryngoscopes during intubation of <1 year old children undergoing neurosurgery regarding intubation times and intubation success rates.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
— 至 1 Year(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • undergoing neurosurgery

排除标准

  • cardiac problems
  • emergency

结局指标

主要结局

intubation time

时间窗: 40 seconds

device entering the oral cavity till visualization of the tube entering through the vocal cords

次要结局

  • insertion time(20 seconds)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Zehra Ipek ARSLAN

Associate Professor

Kocaeli University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in... | 临床试验