Non Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume in Septic Shock Patients
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring cardiac output in patients with septic shock.
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this research is to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring cardiac output and stroke volume in patients with septic shock, to evaluate the potential of EC as a non-invasive alternative for hemodynamic monitoring.
详细描述
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition caused by a dysregulated immune response to infection, leading to organ dysfunction. It remains a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, often progressing rapidly to septic shock and multi-organ failure if not promptly diagnosed and treated.
The complex pathophysiology involves systemic inflammation, endothelial damage, and impaired tissue perfusion, making early recognition and hemodynamic stabilization vital for survival. Accurate monitoring of cardiac function plays a key role in managing septic patients.
Cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) are key hemodynamic parameters guiding therapy in critically ill patients, particularly those with pneumonia and septic shock, who experience severe circulatory and respiratory dysfunction contributing to their high mortality.
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the gold standard for non-invasive bedside assessment of CO and SV, providing precise evaluation of cardiac structure and flow. However, TTE requires operator expertise, can be time-consuming, and may be limited by patient-specific factors.
Electrical cardiometry (EC) is an emerging non-invasive bio-impedance technique offering continuous monitoring with easier application and less operator dependency. Despite its advantages, EC's accuracy and reliability in critically ill septic patients require further validation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •patients aged more than 18 years must be diagnosed with septic shock following the surviving sepsis campaign
排除标准
- •patients aged less than 18 years pregnant women cases suffering cardiac diseases (heart failure, arrhythmia, moderate, and severe valvular disease) patients with poor quality echocardiographic images and measurements
研究组 & 干预措施
septic shock patients
echocardiography and electrical cardiometry will be applied to these patients
干预措施: echocardiogram (Device)
septic shock patients
echocardiography and electrical cardiometry will be applied to these patients
干预措施: Electrical cardiometry (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring cardiac output in patients with septic shock.
时间窗: 2026-2028
to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring cardiac output in patients with septic shock.
cardiac output and stroke volume in septic shock patients
时间窗: baseline
comparison between accuracy and reliability in assessment of cardiac out put and stroke volume using echocardiogram vs electrical cardiometer
to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring stroke volume in patients with septic shock.
时间窗: 2026-2028
to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring stroke volume in patients with septic shock.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Osman Mohamed Osman Khalaf
resident physician
Assiut University
