Comparative Study of Endometrial Polypectomy Performed With Bipolar Electrode Versapoint vs Microscissors or Graspers
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 40
- 主要终点
- To assess the tolerability of polypectomy using a validated visual analogue pain scale
研究概览
简要总结
Hysteroscopy today is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial polyps. Several hysteroscopic systems to resect endometrial polyps are currently available. Among Others bipolar systems and microscissors or graspers, both of theme make part of routine clinical practice and are universally accepted.
The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of bipolar resection energy polypectomy versus microscissors or graspers These procedures assume a lower cost and are associated with a lower surgical risk due to their realization without anesthesia .
Hypothesis: Resection of polyps outpatient laser diode has a similar or superior to that of the bipolar electrode tolerability. The diode laser is a viable , quick , simple technique with a high percentage of resection and high degree of satisfaction of patients
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 60 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •The patient must be informed about the study, and sign the informed consent
排除标准
- •Positive Pap smear test
- •Pregnancy
- •Uterine malignancy
- •Abnormal uterine bleeding
研究组 & 干预措施
Bipolar electrode
Polyps resection with bipolar electrode
干预措施: Bipolar Polypectomy (Procedure)
Bipolar electrode
Polyps resection with bipolar electrode
干预措施: Bipolar electrode (Device)
Microscissors or graspers
Polyps resection with microscissors or graspers
干预措施: Mechanical Polypectomy (Procedure)
Microscissors or graspers
Polyps resection with microscissors or graspers
干预措施: Microscissors or graspers (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
To assess the tolerability of polypectomy using a validated visual analogue pain scale
时间窗: we measure pain after resection of endometrial polyps, with 5 minutes for the patient thinks
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Stefano Angioni
Associate Professor
University of Cagliari