The Impact of Picture Narrative Format on Knowledge and Acceptability for Lung Screening Print Decision Support Materials
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 326
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility self-assessment
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to test whether a picture narrative format is more successful, than text with pictures or text alone, in communicating lung screening information (primarily defined by positive attitudes towards the design and increase in knowledge) to people likely to be invited to lung screening where available.
详细描述
Population screening is key to detecting lung cancer early at a more treatable stage. Uptake of screening should be equitable (i.e., screening benefits all eligible members of the population and does not contribute further to health disparities) and informed (i.e., participants have been involved in the decision to take part and their decision aligns with their values and circumstances). Print decision support materials are the primary mechanism for encouraging engagement with cancer screening and supporting decision making. It is essential that we identify print communication techniques that are effective in informing invitees about lung screening.
The intervention, picture narrative information about lung screening, was previously developed through codesign and prototype testing with people likely to be eligible for lung screening (50 to 75 years old, past or current heavy smokers). Participants will be randomised to one of three groups: Picture narrative format, Text with pictures (control 1) or, Text-only (control 2). This study will assess whether presenting lung screening information in a picture narrative format can improve lung cancer screening knowledge, eligibility self-assessment and attitudes. It will also assess whether perceptions of the information designs can explain any impact of the intervention on these outcomes and whether there are differences across socioeconomic groups.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- Single (Investigator)
盲法说明
The investigators will be blind to intervention allocation because the intervention and questionnaire is to be undertaken independently and remotely by the participants. Although the intervention is not masked from participants, they will not be informed of the purpose of the study or the different conditions until after they have completed all study measures.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 49 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Living in Glasgow
- •Willing and able to respond unaided to invitation to participate in the trial and give informed consent.
- •Aged between 49 and 75 years
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility self-assessment
时间窗: Immediately post-intervention
Concordance between self-reported personal eligibility for lung cancer screening and actual eligibility based on self-reported age and smoking behaviour.
Participant Lung Cancer Screening Attitudes
时间窗: Immediately post-intervention
Self-administered four-item lung cancer screening attitudes measure covering cancer fear, fatalism, benefits, and worry, previously used by Smits et al 2018.
Participant Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge scores
时间窗: Immediately post-intervention
Participants will be asked 6 multiple choice questions related to the lung screening information presented to the participants during the intervention, covering; Procedure, Eligibility - who, Eligibility - why, Benefits, Adverse effects, Potential results.
次要结局
- Participant Design appraisal ratings(Immediately post-intervention)
研究者
Katie Robb
Professor of Behavioural Science and Health
University of Glasgow
