跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02367001
NCT02367001已完成不适用

Randomized Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of a "Targeted Communication" With the General Practitioner Involvement in Cancer Screening Invitation Letters

University Hospital, Tours1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 53,978 人开始时间: 2014年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
53,978
试验地点
1
主要终点
Evaluate the effect on the participation (of the population) in cancer screening of an intervention involving the general practitioner (integration of signature) in the invitation letters

研究概览

简要总结

Our goal is to evaluate, in France, the effectiveness (in terms of participation) of the general practitioner involvement (signature) and a more personalized communication in invitation letters to organized screening of breast, colorectal and cervical cancers.

The hypothesis on which this project is based is that communication is probably more effective if the "receiver" feels personally targeted by invitation letters (Dear Martin, I am writing ...) and if he knows "the issuer "(his general practitioner rather an unknown person).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Screening
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
25 Years 至 74 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Living in Indre-et-Loire (french territorial division 37)
  • •Be affiliated to the following three health insurance companies: CPAM (Caisse Primaire d'Assurance Maladie), MSA (Mutualité Sociale Agricole), or RSI (Régime social des Indépendants)
  • •Having declared (to health insurance company) an attending physician who has given its written consent to participate in the study
  • •Present no exclusion criterion to cancer screening ( for each one)
  • •Be old from 50 to 74 years (breast and colorectal cancer) or from 25 to 65 years (cervical cancer)

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

1: standard invitation

Other

Group 1: sending a standard invitation signed by the coordinating doctor (send by the structure responsible for organized screenings)

Intervention : Normal invitation

干预措施: Normal invitation (Other)

2: Revised invitation

Experimental

Group 2: Sending a revised invitation ( text, layout) signed by the coordinating doctor (send by the structure responsible for organized screenings)

Intervention : revised invitation signed by the coordinating doctor

干预措施: revised invitation signed by the coordinating doctor (Other)

3 : revised invitation signed by the attending physician

Experimental

Group 3: Sending a revised invitation signed by the attending physician (send by the structure responsible for organized screenings)

Intervention : Revised invitation signed by the attending physician

干预措施: Revised invitation signed by the attending physician (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Evaluate the effect on the participation (of the population) in cancer screening of an intervention involving the general practitioner (integration of signature) in the invitation letters

时间窗: 9 or 12 months after the invitation letters

The participation / non participation will be measured for each cancer screening (breast, colorectal and cervical) : * 9 months after the invitation letters for breast and colorectal cancers * 12 months after the invitation letters for cervical cancer The participation rate is defined as the number of people having participated, divided by the total number of people in the group or subgroup considered. Analysis by comparing the participation rates between groups (Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3) and sub-groups will be done.

次要结局

  • Evaluate the effectiveness on the participation (of the population) of the use of a simplified and more focused communication in the invitation letters : comparison of the participation rates in arm 1 (normal invitation) and arm 2 (revised invitation)(9 or 12 months after the invitation letters)
  • Cost-effectiveness of different strategies for each cancer screening (breast, colorectal and cervical) as measured by cost effectiveness ratio (total costs in Euros divided by total screened people)(9 or 12 months after the invitation letters)
  • Evaluate the effectiveness on the participation (of the population) of the two types of general practitioner signature (typed versus typed + handwritten) by comparing the participation rates between two sub-groups in the arm 3.(9 or 12 months after the invitation letters)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验