跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02727478
NCT02727478已完成不适用

Highly Challenging Balance Training for People With Parkinson's Disease (the BETA-PD Study): Non-randomized Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Trial

Karolinska Institutet2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 117 人开始时间: 2016年3月28日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
117
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change in Mini-BESTest Score From Baseline at 1 Week Post Intervention.

研究概览

简要总结

This effectiveness-implementation study is a part of the larger study BETA-PD (Balance, Elderly, Training and Activity in Parkinson's Disease), which has the long-term goal to reduce the risk of falling in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) by improving balance, gait and physical activity level. The main hypothesis is that highly challenging balance training will lead to greater gait and balance ability, increased levels of physical activity and an improved health related quality of life. The main aims of the study are to evaluate the effectiveness of the HiBalance program in real-life clinical settings, while exploring facilitators and barriers for program implementation on a wider scale.

详细描述

The clinical features of PD include progressive postural instability, hypokinesia, tremor and rigidity. It is therefore common that people with PD experience reduced balance and gait function, symptoms which can have far-reaching negative effects on their health and quality of life. Injurious falls and fear of falling are especially prevalent among those with PD, a factor which may partly explain why this group are less physically active than older people of a similar age without the diagnosis. Balance and gait training, on the other hand, have been shown effective in PD and also appear to have potential neuro-protective properties. Research in the area of balance training in PD disease however is sparse and previous interventions have been criticized for applying training stimuli which lacked intensity and challenge.

The HiBalance program is based on scientifically well-established principles of exercise training and postural control as well as current research on training in PD. The program was developed to affect symptom-specific balance impairments in PD by targeting four main subsystems underlying balance control (stability limits, anticipatory postural adjustments, sensory integration and motor agility). The intervention consists of a 10-week progressive balance training program in group format (5-7 participants). Each training session is conducted by a minimum of 2 physiotherapist trainers, during twice weekly 1-hour sessions (20 hours in total). Additionally, a home-exercise program is carried out by the participants once a week during the trial period. The difficulty level of the group-based training is increased in three consecutive blocks. To ensure highly challenging exercises, each task is individually adjusted by altering the area of base of support, increasing movement speed/amplitude and/or restricting vision and varying the grade of multitasking. The program has previously been proven feasible [Conradsson, 2012] and effective [Conradsson, 2015] in improving balance and gait impairments in a randomized controlled hospital setting. In addition, favorable transfer effects were seen in relation to physical activity levels and the performance of activities of everyday life.

For research interventions to be adopted in real-life clinical settings however a level of adaptation is required. Best practice then involves evaluating the effectiveness of efficacious programs in clinical settings, in order to verify whether or not the adaptation has attenuated the effective core elements of the program itself.

The current study combines a clinical effectiveness trial together with implementation research. Use of a type-1 hybrid design will allow the effects of the HiBalance program in clinical settings to be tested while simultaneously gathering information on barriers and facilitators to the implementation process [Curran, 2012]. Use of the hybrid design also allows for constant monitoring of the process by which the intervention is applied, and therefore allow problems in early application to be identified and quickly altered so as to ensure better outcomes. A participatory approach will be adhered to whereby 'users' of the program (physiotherapist trainers) will be actively involved in all stages of the program adaptation, process and outcome evaluation. This approach is recommended in order to increase the relevance, acceptability and successful implementation of the program. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) will be used in the current study to guide the investigation of potential barriers to and facilitators of the implementation process [Damschroder, 2009 ].

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Diagnosed idiopathic Parkinson's Disease
  • Measured balance impairment (according to the mini-BESTest)
  • Hoehn and Yahr stages 2-3
  • Independent ambulator indoors without a walking aid

排除标准

  • Cognitive impairment which hinders participation in group training
  • The presence of comorbidities which hinder safe participation in group training

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Mini-BESTest Score From Baseline at 1 Week Post Intervention.

时间窗: Change in Mini-BESTest score from baseline at 1 week post intervention.

Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test a rating scale for dynamic balance incorporating 14 different balance and gait items that were assessed by a physical therapist on a scale from 0-2. Maximum points 28. 0-28 points with higher scores indicating better balance control The mini-BESTest is an assessment of balance performance and will be performed by the physiotherapists in the respective clinics.

次要结局

  • Change in 10-meter Walking Test Score From Baseline at 1 Week Post Intervention.(From baseline at 1 week post intervention.)
  • Change in Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test From Baseline at 1 Week Post Intervention.(From baseline at 1 week post intervention.)
  • Change in EQ-5D Score From Baseline at 1week Post Intervention.(From baseline at 1week post intervention.)
  • Change in Physical Activity Level From Baseline 1 Week Post Intervention.(from baseline to 1 week post intervention)
  • Change in Dual Task Interference During the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test From Baseline at 1 Week Post Intervention.(From baseline at 1 week post intervention.)
  • Change in Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale(From baseline at 1 week post intervention.)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Erika Franzén

Associate Professor

Karolinska Institutet

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验