跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04902066
NCT04902066已完成不适用

Face Your Fears: An Assessor-blinded, RCT Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioural Virtual Reality Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders.

Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 259 人开始时间: 2021年4月9日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
259
试验地点
2
主要终点
(GPTS) Green Paranoid Thought Scale Part B: Ideas of persecution.

研究概览

简要总结

The study is a randomised, assessor-blinded parallel-groups superiority clinical trial fulfilling the CONSORT criteria for non-pharmacological treatment. A total of 256 patients will be allocated to either Cognitive Behavioural Virtual Reality Therapy plus treatment as usual, versus traditional CBT for psychosis plus treatment as usual. All participants will be assessed at baseline and 3- and 9 months post baseline. A stratified block-randomisation with concealed randomisation sequence will be conducted. Independent assessors blinded to the treatment will evaluate outcome. Analysis of outcome will be carried out with the intention to treat principles.

详细描述

Ideas of reference and ideas of persecution are among the most frequent symptoms in psychotic disorders, and they hinder patients in conducting daily activities such as leaving the home or using public transportation - as well as inflicting immensely on their quality of life. The social avoidance caused by these symptoms does not improve with antipsychotic mediation. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for psychosis has demonstrated beneficial effect on psychotic symptoms, but the average effect sizes are in the small to moderate range, and training and resource requirements mean that, in practice, therapy is not delivered to all those who might benefit. Hence, there is considerable interest in the development of novel therapies that draw on the principles of cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis, but which are shorter, more effective, and are capable of being delivered by a wider workforce. Augmenting CBT with virtual reality exposure has the possibility of creating artificial experiences in real time, that make the user feel immersed and able to interact as if it was the real world. Additionally, virtual reality therapy allows for personalization of the therapy to match the specific social challenges of each patient. Preliminary findings suggest virtual reality exposure to lead to faster symptom reduction than traditional therapy. While the potential beneficial effects of virtual reality exposure to psychotic, and sub-threshold psychotic symptoms, such as ideas of reference and ideas of persecution, are evident and virtual reality therapies are promising in general, the research field is in an urgent need of evidence on the effectiveness of virtual reality therapy in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The proposed trial is hitherto the largest trial in the world to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural virtual reality therapy (CBT-VR) compared to traditional CBT. The investigators expect to find CBT-VR to be more beneficial in reducing ideas of reference and ideas of persecution in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Additionally, the investigators expect it to result in improved depressive, anxiety-, and negative symptoms, as well as improved social cognition and psychosocial functioning and quality of life in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The target group in the trial also encompass patients with schizotypal disorder (often young adults), showing subthreshold psychotic symptoms (e.g. ideas of reference), that are at increased risk of developing manifest psychosis. The CBT-VR may show efficacy in preventing progression to an overt psychotic state in these patients. Hence, there is a great potential for CBT-VR in the treatment of patients with psychosis and sub-threshold psychosis, but studies are needed to establish evidence for the treatment. If the results of the current trial are positive, the manualised treatment can easily be implemented in clinical practise.

Note:

When the trial was initiated, the original primary outcome was ideas of persecution, measured with part B in Green Paranoid Thought Scale (GPTS) while ideas of social reference, measured with part A in Green Paranoid Thought Scale, was listed as a secondary outcome in the trial protocol, here on Clinicaltrials.gov and in the approval from the Committee on Health Research Ethics of the Capital Region Denmark.

During our trial, our impressions in the clinical assessments were, that ideas of social reference seem to be a more appropriate primary outcome due to our population including people diagnosed with schizotypal disorders along with participants with manifest psychotic disorders.

We observed that participants with schizotypal disorders experiencing ideas of social reference, that are more attenuated paranoid ideations, would often receive a low score on the GPTS part B. Therefore, listing GPTS part B as primary outcome would hypothetically only reflect the symptom level of part of the study population (patients with manifest psychosis), while not fully comprising the symptom level, and potential for change, found in the population of patients with schizotypal disorder. ''

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Independent assessors blinded to the treatment will evaluate outcome. Investigator's conduct assessment and/or supervise assessments and are masked.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 18 - years
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • A schizophrenia spectrum disorder (ICD-10 code: F20 -F29)
  • Green Paranoid Thought Scale total score ≥ 40

排除标准

  • Rejecting informed consent
  • A diagnosis of organic brain disease
  • IQ of 70 or lower (known mental retardation as assessed by medical record)
  • A command of spoken Danish or English inadequate for engaging in therapy
  • Inability to tolerate the assessment process

研究组 & 干预措施

Cognitive Behavioural Virtual Reality Therapy (CBT-VR)

Experimental

The CBT-VR consists of traditional CBT with the augmentation of virtual reality exposure. The virtual reality exposure comprises four virtual social environments (a bus, café, street, and supermarket). These are daily social situations that generally elicit paranoid thinking in patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. While virtually engaging in these distressing situations, the therapist will facilitate a CBT dialogue aimed at generating alternative (i.e. non-threatening) thinking, diminishing safety behaviours (e.g. social isolation), and building up new coping strategies. This is expected to alleviate distress, anxiety, and improve daily social functioning. Preliminary findings reveal this virtual reality program to be well-tolerated and highly effective in reducing paranoia and anxiety in psychosis. Patients will be offered 10 individual sessions.

干预措施: Cognitive Behavioural Virtual Reality Therapy. (Other)

Traditional Cognitive Behavioural Therapy

Active Comparator

The treatment in the CBT group will follow the core principles of CBT used for psychotic disorders. The CBT treatment facilitates an individualised, problem-oriented approach, and uses key CBT techniques such as developing a problem and goal list, normalising psychotic-like experiences, evaluation of appraisals, and removing or diminishing safety behaviour. Patients will be offered 10 individual sessions.

干预措施: Traditional Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

(GPTS) Green Paranoid Thought Scale Part B: Ideas of persecution.

时间窗: 3 months from inclusion

The primary outcome is level of ideas of persecution measured with Green Paranoid Thought Scale at cessation of treatment at 3-months. The Green Paranoid Thought Scale has displayed good reliability and validity in patients with psychosis, displaying paranoid, persecutory delusions, and has also been used in patients at-risk for psychosis showing subthreshold psychotic symptoms. Minimum total score: 32. Maximum total score: 160. Part A (Ideas of social reference) minimum score: 16 and maximum score: 80. Part B (ideas of persecution) minimum score 16 and maximum score: 80. Part B score = or \> 45 are assumed to be threshold for development of persecutory delusion. Higher score means worse outcome.

次要结局

  • SBQ (Safety Behaviour Questionnaire)(3 and 9 months from inclusion)
  • PSP (Personal and Social Performance Scale)(3 and 9 months from inclusion)
  • CANTAB ERT (Emotion Recognition Task)(3 and 9 months from inclusion)
  • SIAS (Social Interaction Anxiety Scale)(3 and 9 months from inclusion)
  • (GPTS) Green Paranoid Thought Scale Part A: Ideas of social reference(3 and 9 months from inclusion)
  • (GPTS) Green Paranoid Thought Scale Part B: Ideas of persecution(9 months from inclusion)

研究者

发起方
Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Merete Nordentoft

Professor

Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验