跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05334173
NCT05334173进行中(未招募)不适用

Randomized Clinical Trial on the Outcome of Gastric Bypass With Biliopancreatic and Alimentary Limbs of 150 Centimeters (cm)/70 cm Versus(vs) 70/150 cm, Measuring the Length of the Common Limb

Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada6 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 94 人开始时间: 2019年1月29日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
94
试验地点
6
主要终点
Excess Weight Loss (%EWL)

研究概览

简要总结

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) has been the most performed bariatric surgical intervention until a few years ago, due to its good results in terms of weight loss and remission of comorbidities such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. However, more than 25% of patients do not obtain the expected result.

There is no uniform technique to perform a LRYGB, but traditionally it was constructed using a long alimentary limb (AL) and a short biliopancreatic limb (BPL). There is no current consensus on the ideal length of the LRYGB limbs.

The distal gastric bypass at the expense of a longer biliopancreatic limb (LBPL-GB) could induce more excess of weight loss (EWL%), but with possible protein malnutrition depending on the length of the remaining common limb.

The aim of this study is compare a LBPL-GB (BPL 150cm, AL 70cm) with LAL-GB (BPL 70cm, AL 150cm).

PRIMARY OUTCOME: to evaluate if there are differences in weight loss. SECONDARY OUTCOME: to assess whether there are differences in both groups in remission of the most common comorbidities and in quality of life.

DESIGN: multicenter, prospective, randomized study in blocks (1:1), blinded for the patient and to the surgeon up to the time of intervention, in patients with indication of RYGB for obesity (BMI>35 with associated comorbidity or BMI>40 with or without comorbidity, excluding those of BMI>50). Intervention: LRYGB type 1 (LAL-GB: 150cm ALand 70cm BPL) or type 2 (LBPL-GB: 70cm AL and 150cm BPL).

The expected result is that the patients with LBPL-GB present better EWL%, and higher remission of their comorbidities than the comparison group

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

盲法说明

Blinded for the patient and to the surgeon up to the time of intervention

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with BMI 35-40 kg/m2 with associated medical problems (Diabetes Mellitus, Hipertension, Dyslipidemia, Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome) or 40-50 kg/m2 with or without associated medical problems, who comply with the regulatory rules for bariatric surgery in Spain (SECO and AEC)

排除标准

  • General contraindications to kind of surgery
  • BMI > 50 kg/m2
  • Known drug or alcohol abuse
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status classification > III
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study

结局指标

主要结局

Excess Weight Loss (%EWL)

时间窗: From baseline to five years after surgery

The Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) after surgery. (Preoperatory weight in kilograms - current weight in kilograms) / (preoperatory weight in kilograms) x 100

次要结局

  • Remission or improvement of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus(From baseline to five years after surgery)
  • Remission or improvement of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome(From baseline to five years after surgery)
  • Remission of improvement of Dyslipidemia(From baseline to five years after surgery)
  • Remission or improvement of Hypertension(From baseline to five years after surgery)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Débora Acín

MD, PhD, Bariatric Surgeon

Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada

研究点 (6)

Loading locations...

相似试验